From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
Adam Young <admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Robbie King <robbiek@xsightlabs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] mailbox: pcc: Fix the possible race in updation of chan_in_use flag
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:40:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ecf3a7a-7a68-fd56-ed93-fbae82e2b0e3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250305-pcc_fixes_updates-v2-1-1b1822bc8746@arm.com>
在 2025/3/6 0:38, Sudeep Holla 写道:
> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>
> The function mbox_chan_received_data() calls the Rx callback of the
> mailbox client driver. The callback might set chan_in_use flag from
> pcc_send_data(). This flag's status determines whether the PCC channel
> is in use.
>
> However, there is a potential race condition where chan_in_use is
> updated incorrectly due to concurrency between the interrupt handler
> (pcc_mbox_irq()) and the command sender(pcc_send_data()).
>
> The 'chan_in_use' flag of a channel is set to true after sending a
> command. And the flag of the new command may be cleared erroneous by
> the interrupt handler afer mbox_chan_received_data() returns,
>
> As a result, the interrupt being level triggered can't be cleared in
> pcc_mbox_irq() and it will be disabled after the number of handled times
> exceeds the specified value. The error log is as follows:
>
> | kunpeng_hccs HISI04B2:00: PCC command executed timeout!
> | kunpeng_hccs HISI04B2:00: get port link status info failed, ret = -110
> | irq 13: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> | Call trace:
> | dump_backtrace+0x0/0x210
> | show_stack+0x1c/0x2c
> | dump_stack+0xec/0x130
> | __report_bad_irq+0x50/0x190
> | note_interrupt+0x1e4/0x260
> | handle_irq_event+0x144/0x17c
> | handle_fasteoi_irq+0xd0/0x240
> | __handle_domain_irq+0x80/0xf0
> | gic_handle_irq+0x74/0x2d0
> | el1_irq+0xbc/0x140
> | mnt_clone_write+0x0/0x70
> | file_update_time+0xcc/0x160
> | fault_dirty_shared_page+0xe8/0x150
> | do_shared_fault+0x80/0x1d0
> | do_fault+0x118/0x1a4
> | handle_pte_fault+0x154/0x230
> | __handle_mm_fault+0x1ac/0x390
> | handle_mm_fault+0xf0/0x250
> | do_page_fault+0x184/0x454
> | do_translation_fault+0xac/0xd4
> | do_mem_abort+0x44/0xb4
> | el0_da+0x40/0x74
> | el0_sync_handler+0x60/0xb4
> | el0_sync+0x168/0x180
> | handlers:
> | pcc_mbox_irq
> | Disabling IRQ #13
>
> To solve this issue, pcc_mbox_irq() must clear 'chan_in_use' flag before
> the call to mbox_chan_received_data().
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> (sudeep.holla: Minor updates to the subject and commit message)
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> index 82102a4c5d68839170238540a6fed61afa5185a0..f2e4087281c70eeb5b9b33371596613a371dff4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> @@ -333,10 +333,15 @@ static irqreturn_t pcc_mbox_irq(int irq, void *p)
> if (pcc_chan_reg_read_modify_write(&pchan->plat_irq_ack))
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> + /*
> + * Clear this flag immediately after updating interrupt ack register
> + * to avoid possible race in updatation of the flag from
> + * pcc_send_data() that could execute from mbox_chan_received_data()
This comment may be inappropriate becuase of the moving of clearing
interrupt ack register in patch 2/13.
I suggested that fix it in this patch or patch 2/13.
> + */
> + pchan->chan_in_use = false;
> mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
>
> check_and_ack(pchan, chan);
> - pchan->chan_in_use = false;
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 16:38 [PATCH v2 00/13] mailbox: pcc: Fixes and cleanup/refactoring Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] mailbox: pcc: Fix the possible race in updation of chan_in_use flag Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 11:40 ` lihuisong (C) [this message]
2025-03-11 12:02 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 12:15 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-13 15:07 ` Robbie King
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] mailbox: pcc: Always clear the platform ack interrupt first Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 11:19 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-12 22:25 ` Adam Young
2025-03-13 15:08 ` Robbie King
2025-03-13 15:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] mailbox: pcc: Drop unnecessary endianness conversion of pcc_hdr.flags Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 11:19 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-12 22:26 ` Adam Young
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] mailbox: pcc: Return early if no GAS register from pcc_mbox_cmd_complete_check Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 11:20 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-12 22:27 ` Adam Young
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] mailbox: pcc: Use acpi_os_ioremap() instead of ioremap() Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 11:21 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-12 22:27 ` Adam Young
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] mailbox: pcc: Refactor error handling in irq handler into separate function Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 11:23 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-12 22:28 ` Adam Young
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] mailbox: pcc: Always map the shared memory communication address Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 11:32 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-11 11:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 12:31 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-12 22:29 ` Adam Young
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] mailbox: pcc: Refactor and simplify check_and_ack() Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 11:47 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-11 12:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 12:19 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-03-11 12:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-12 22:29 ` Adam Young
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] soc: hisilicon: kunpeng_hccs: Simplify PCC shared memory region handling Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] i2c: xgene-slimpro: " Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] hwmon: (xgene-hwmon) " Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] ACPI: PCC: " Sudeep Holla
2025-03-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] ACPI: CPPC: " Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] mailbox: pcc: Fixes and cleanup/refactoring Sudeep Holla
2025-03-12 18:04 ` Adam Young
2025-03-12 20:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-12 20:37 ` Adam Young
2025-03-13 9:38 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ecf3a7a-7a68-fd56-ed93-fbae82e2b0e3@huawei.com \
--to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=admiyo@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robbiek@xsightlabs.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox