From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Luck, Tony: "@mail.linuxfoundation.org Subject: [PATCH] Use safe_halt() rather than halt() in acpi_idle_play_deay() Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:37:28 -0700 Message-ID: <4f7b27487632dad07@agluck-desktop.sc.intel.com> References: <4F79EBAA.7040602@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F79EBAA.7040602@amd.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org ACPI code is shared by arch/x86 and arch/ia64. ia64 doesn't provide a plain "halt()" function. Use safe_halt() instead. Signed-off-by: Tony Luck --- E-mail discussion indicated this would be OK. Please check on x86 before applying. diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c index b3447f6..f3decb3 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_play_dead(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index) while (1) { if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_HALT) - halt(); + safe_halt(); else if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_SYSTEMIO) { inb(cx->address); /* See comment in acpi_idle_do_entry() */