public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Remove last acpi procfs dirs after being marked deprecated for a decade
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:45:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5013960.NG3uzariRI@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hJ4o3nkJOUFEkvRBekWjm2YXfL1UOUBy2RK3VepMOdFg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 7:46:23 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 6:07 PM Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 27. Mai 2020, 17:49:09 CEST schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:33 PM Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> wrote:
> > > > Kernel development should not be hindered anymore by this absolutely
> > > > outdated stuff.
> > >
> > > Well, this is a bit vague.
> > >
> > > I'm not against making this change, but why do it now?  Is there
> > > anything in particular that cannot be done without it?
> >
> > Because of the deprecated message being shown on laptops booting with
> > the option enabled. I got a bugreport about it recently.
> >
> > I could not please check_patch to properly include this commit id
> > (recon the double quotes in the title):
> >
> > e63f6e28dda6de3de2392ddca321e211fd860925
> > Date:   Mon Jul 7 01:13:46 2014 +0200
> >
> >     Revert "ACPI / AC: Remove AC's proc directory."
> >
> >     Revert commit ab0fd674d6ce (ACPI / AC: Remove AC's proc directory.),
> >     because some old tools (e.g. kpowersave from kde 3.5.10) are still
> >     using /proc/acpi/ac_adapter.
> >
> >     Fixes: ab0fd674d6ce (ACPI / AC: Remove AC's proc directory.)
> >
> >
> > kpowersave was written by myself and I can say for sure, that this stuff
> > is more than outdated.
> 
> Fair enough, but I'd rather stage it for 5.9 to give it a full cycle
> of baking in linux-next.

And so applied now as 5.9 material, thanks!




      reply	other threads:[~2020-06-22 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-27 15:33 Remove last acpi procfs dirs after being marked deprecated for a decade Thomas Renninger
2020-05-27 15:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-27 16:07   ` Thomas Renninger
2020-05-27 17:46     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 15:45       ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5013960.NG3uzariRI@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox