From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpuidle : rename function name "__cpuidle_register_driver"
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:00:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505A2474.7090705@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201209192151.03236.rjw@sisk.pl>
On 09/19/2012 09:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 19, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Clarify the purpose of the function by changing its name and
>> move the condition out of this function.
> Why exactly are you removing the condition?
I just moved the condition out from the function and called it when the
condition is true.
if (!drv->power_specified)
set_power_states(drv);
But please, drop this patch too. I noticed there is an overlap with the
next patch I have in my series but not published.
Accidentally I removed "cpuidle_curr_driver = drv;"
Sorry for the inconvenience. Time for me to go to bed :)
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpuidle/driver.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c b/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
>> index 40cd3f3..774d2cb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
>> @@ -17,9 +17,10 @@
>> static struct cpuidle_driver *cpuidle_curr_driver;
>> DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpuidle_driver_lock);
>>
>> -static void __cpuidle_register_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
>> +static void set_power_states(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
>> {
>> int i;
>> +
>> /*
>> * cpuidle driver should set the drv->power_specified bit
>> * before registering if the driver provides
>> @@ -34,10 +35,8 @@ static void __cpuidle_register_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
>> * an power value of -1. So we use -2, -3, etc, for other
>> * c-states.
>> */
>> - if (!drv->power_specified) {
>> - for (i = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i < drv->state_count; i++)
>> - drv->states[i].power_usage = -1 - i;
>> - }
>> + for (i = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i < drv->state_count; i++)
>> + drv->states[i].power_usage = -1 - i;
>> }
>>
>>
>> @@ -58,8 +57,10 @@ int cpuidle_register_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
>> spin_unlock(&cpuidle_driver_lock);
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>> - __cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
>> - cpuidle_curr_driver = drv;
>> +
>> + if (!drv->power_specified)
>> + set_power_states(drv);
>> +
>> spin_unlock(&cpuidle_driver_lock);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-19 17:22 [PATCH 1/3] cpuidle : remove unused ref count function Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-19 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpuidle : rename function name "__cpuidle_register_driver" Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-19 19:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-19 20:00 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-09-19 17:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle : remove trailing carriage return Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-19 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-19 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpuidle : remove unused ref count function Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-19 19:56 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505A2474.7090705@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).