From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tang Chen Subject: Re: [BUG Fix Patch 1/6] Bug fix: Hold spinlock across find|remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X operation. Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:12:07 +0800 Message-ID: <50F60C77.9000201@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1358247267-18089-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <1358247267-18089-2-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:47069 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757252Ab3APCMx (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:12:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Julian Calaby Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com, len.brown@intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, cl@linux.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, wujianguo@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, hpa@zytor.com, linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org, glommer@parallels.com, jiang.liu@huawei.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On 01/16/2013 06:26 AM, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi Tang, > > One minor point. > >> >> /* >> - * Search memmap entry >> + * firmware_map_find_entry: Search memmap entry. >> + * @start: Start of the memory range. >> + * @end: End of the memory range (exclusive). >> + * @type: Type of the memory range. >> + * >> + * This function is to find the memmap entey of a given memory range. >> + * The caller must hold map_entries_lock, and must not release the lock >> + * until the processing of the returned entry has completed. >> + * >> + * Return pointer to the entry to be found on success, or NULL on failure. > > Why not make this completely kernel-doc compliant as you're already > re-writing the comment? Hi Julian, Thank you for reminding me this. I think I may have some more problems like this. I'll post a patch to fix as many of them as I can. :) Thanks.