From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: Overriding ACPI tables via initrd only works with an initrd and on X86 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:02:18 -0800 Message-ID: <512BC34A.9090504@zytor.com> References: <1361538742-67599-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <1361538742-67599-3-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:32891 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759460Ab3BYUDQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:03:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Renninger , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, aaron.lu@intel.com, devurandom@gmx.net On 02/25/2013 12:00 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > Can replace max_low_pfn_mapped with max_low_pfn instead ? > like to see if you can put acpi tables above 4G for x86_64. > > if it does not work, you can use min(max_low_pfn< instead. > This is part of why we really need to get rid of these stupid variables one and for all. The only exception should perhaps be to mark the HIGHMEM crossover point on HIGHMEM systems. -hpa