public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com,
	wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Remove acpi_memory_info->failed bit
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:19:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514679BC.5020700@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363186213.12845.174.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>

Hi Toshi,

Sorry for the late reply

2013/03/13 23:50, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 15:54 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> At http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=135769405622667&w=2 thread,
>> Toshi Kani mentioned as follows:
>>
>> "I have a question about the change you made in commit 65479472 in
>> acpi_memhotplug.c.  This change seems to require that
>> acpi_memory_enable_device() calls add_memory() to add all memory ranges
>> represented by memory device objects at boot-time, and keep the results
>> be used for hot-remove.
>>
>> If I understand it right, this add_memory() call fails with EEXIST at
>> boot-time since all memory ranges should have been added from EFI memory
>> table (or e820) already.  This results all memory ranges be marked as !
>> enabled & !failed.  I think this means that we cannot hot-delete any
>> memory ranges presented at boot-time since acpi_memory_remove_memory()
>> only calls remove_memory() when the enabled flag is set.  Is that
>> correct?"
>>
>> Above mention is correct. Thus even if memory device supports hotplug,
>> memory presented at boot-time cannot be hot removed since the memory
>> device's acpi_memory_info->enabled is always 0.
>>
>> This patch changes to set 1 to "acpi_memory_info->enabled" of memory
>> device presented at boot-time for hot removing the memory device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |    4 ++--
>>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
>> index da1f82b..88fd46a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
>> @@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
>>   			continue;
>>   		}
>>
>> -		if (!result)
>> -			info->enabled = 1;
>> +		info->enabled = 1;
>
> Do we still need to keep the enable bit?  I think !failed means enabled
> with this change.

For controlling memory hotplug, we need either failed bit or enabled bit.
So I want to remove failed bit as follows:

---

acpi_memory_info has enabled bit and failed bit for controlling memory
hotplug. But we don't need to keep both bits.

The patch removes acpi_memory_info->failed bit.

Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
  drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   15 ++-------------
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
index 88fd46a..cf4e1cf 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
@@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ struct acpi_memory_info {
  	unsigned short caching;	/* memory cache attribute */
  	unsigned short write_protect;	/* memory read/write attribute */
  	unsigned int enabled:1;
-	unsigned int failed:1;
  };
  
  struct acpi_memory_device {
@@ -249,10 +248,8 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
  		 * returns -EEXIST. If add_memory() returns the other error, it
  		 * means that this memory block is not used by the kernel.
  		 */
-		if (result && result != -EEXIST) {
-			info->failed = 1;
+		if (result && result != -EEXIST)
  			continue;
-		}
  
  		info->enabled = 1;
  
@@ -286,16 +283,8 @@ static int acpi_memory_remove_memory(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
  	nid = acpi_get_node(mem_device->device->handle);
  
  	list_for_each_entry_safe(info, n, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
-		if (info->failed)
-			/* The kernel does not use this memory block */
-			continue;
-
  		if (!info->enabled)
-			/*
-			 * The kernel uses this memory block, but it may be not
-			 * managed by us.
-			 */
-			return -EBUSY;
+			continue;
  
  		if (nid < 0)
  			nid = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr);


  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-18  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-13  6:54 [Bug fix PATCH] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: enable acpi_memory_info->enabled of memory device presented at boot-time Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-13 14:50 ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-18  2:19   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
2013-03-19 15:03     ` [PATCH] Remove acpi_memory_info->failed bit Toshi Kani
2013-03-20 23:57       ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21  4:36         ` [Bug fix PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: enable acpi_memory_info->enabled of memory device presented at boot-time Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21  4:39           ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: Remove acpi_memory_info->failed bit Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21  4:45             ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-22  0:29             ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-22  1:35               ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-22  1:53               ` [PATCH v3 " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-22 20:24                 ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-25 23:57                   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-26 13:41                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-27 23:58                       ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-04-01 23:48                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-02  0:12                           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-04-02 12:57                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-02 23:55                               ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21  4:44           ` [Bug fix PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: enable acpi_memory_info->enabled of memory device presented at boot-time Yasuaki Ishimatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=514679BC.5020700@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox