public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@web.de>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI video: Fix brightness control initialization for some laptops.
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:26:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5146C1B4.4050907@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363342248-6496-1-git-send-email-dannybaumann@web.de>

On 03/15/2013 06:10 PM, Danny Baumann wrote:
> In particular, this fixes brightness control initialization for all
> devices that return index values from _BQC and don't happen to have the
> initial index set by the BIOS in their _BCL table. One example for that
> is the Dell Inspiron 15R SE (model number 7520).
> 
> What happened for those devices is that acpi_init_brightness queried the
> initial brightness by calling acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current.
> This called _BQC, which returned e.g. 13. As _BQC_use_index isn't
> determined at this point (and thus has its initial value of 0), the
> index isn't converted into the actual level. As '13' isn't present in
> the _BCL list, *level is later overwritten with brightness->curr, which
> was initialized to max_level (100) before. Later in
> acpi_init_brightness, level_old (with the value 100) is used as an index
> into the _BCL table, which causes a value outside of the actual table to
> be used as input into acpi_video_device_lcd_set_level(). Depending on
> the (undefined) value of that location, this call will fail, causing the
> brightness control for the device in question not to be enabled.
> 
> Fix that by returning the raw value returned by the _BQC call in the
> initialization case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@web.de>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/video.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> index 313f959..9c33871 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int acpi_video_device_lcd_set_level(struct acpi_video_device *device,
>  			int level);
>  static int acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(
>  			struct acpi_video_device *device,
> -			unsigned long long *level, int init);
> +			unsigned long long *level, int raw);

Why not bool?

Thanks,
Aaron

>  static int acpi_video_get_next_level(struct acpi_video_device *device,
>  				     u32 level_current, u32 event);
>  static int acpi_video_switch_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device,
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static struct dmi_system_id video_dmi_table[] __initdata = {
>  
>  static int
>  acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(struct acpi_video_device *device,
> -					unsigned long long *level, int init)
> +					unsigned long long *level, int raw)
>  {
>  	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
>  	int i;
> @@ -463,6 +463,15 @@ acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(struct acpi_video_device *device,
>  		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->dev->handle, buf,
>  						NULL, level);
>  		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> +			if (raw) {
> +				/*
> +				 * Caller has indicated he wants the raw
> +				 * value returned by _BQC, so don't furtherly
> +				 * mess with the value.
> +				 */
> +				return 0;
> +			}
> +
>  			if (device->brightness->flags._BQC_use_index) {
>  				if (device->brightness->flags._BCL_reversed)
>  					*level = device->brightness->count
> @@ -476,16 +485,14 @@ acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(struct acpi_video_device *device,
>  					device->brightness->curr = *level;
>  					return 0;
>  			}
> -			if (!init) {
> -				/*
> -				 * BQC returned an invalid level.
> -				 * Stop using it.
> -				 */
> -				ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO,
> -					      "%s returned an invalid level",
> -					      buf));
> -				device->cap._BQC = device->cap._BCQ = 0;
> -			}
> +			/*
> +			 * BQC returned an invalid level.
> +			 * Stop using it.
> +			 */
> +			ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO,
> +				      "%s returned an invalid level",
> +				      buf));
> +			device->cap._BQC = device->cap._BCQ = 0;
>  		} else {
>  			/* Fixme:
>  			 * should we return an error or ignore this failure?
> @@ -714,7 +721,7 @@ acpi_video_init_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device)
>  	if (result)
>  		goto out_free_levels;
>  
> -	result = acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(device, &level, 0);
> +	result = acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(device, &level, 1);
>  	if (result)
>  		goto out_free_levels;
>  
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-18  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-15 10:10 [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI video: Fix brightness control initialization for some laptops Danny Baumann
2013-03-15 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI video: Make logic a little easier to understand Danny Baumann
2013-03-15 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI video: Fix applying indexed initial brightness value Danny Baumann
2013-03-18  8:16   ` Aaron Lu
2013-03-18  8:26     ` Danny Baumann
2013-03-18  8:34       ` Aaron Lu
2013-03-18  7:26 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2013-03-18  8:22   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI video: Fix brightness control initialization for some laptops Danny Baumann
2013-03-18  8:31     ` Aaron Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5146C1B4.4050907@intel.com \
    --to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=dannybaumann@web.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox