Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI video: Fix brightness control initialization for some laptops.

[Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>]

On 03/18/2013 04:22 PM, Danny Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
>>> index 313f959..9c33871 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
>>> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int acpi_video_device_lcd_set_level(struct acpi_video_device *device,
>>>   			int level);
>>>   static int acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(
>>>   			struct acpi_video_device *device,
>>> -			unsigned long long *level, int init);
>>> +			unsigned long long *level, int raw);
>>
>> Why not bool?
> 
> For two reasons:
> - It previous was int ;-)

Right, but since we are doing something now, we can probably change it
for better :-)

> - It allowed the invocations of this function to fit within one 80-char 
> line.

the unsigned long long for level made me curious, do we really need that?
int would suffice I think.

> 
> Neither reason is terribly strong, so if you prefer, I can convert this 
> argument to bool.

It's OK, I can do the cleaup some time later.

Thanks,
Aaron