From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>, rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com,
wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug fix PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: enable acpi_memory_info->enabled of memory device presented at boot-time
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:44:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514A903A.9000909@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514A8E3C.1050902@jp.fujitsu.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2348 bytes --]
The mail's tab become spaces. So I attached origianl patch.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013/03/21 13:36, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> At http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=135769405622667&w=2 thread,
> Toshi Kani mentioned as follows:
>
> "I have a question about the change you made in commit 65479472 in
> acpi_memhotplug.c. This change seems to require that
> acpi_memory_enable_device() calls add_memory() to add all memory ranges
> represented by memory device objects at boot-time, and keep the results
> be used for hot-remove.
>
> If I understand it right, this add_memory() call fails with EEXIST at
> boot-time since all memory ranges should have been added from EFI memory
> table (or e820) already. This results all memory ranges be marked as !
> enabled & !failed. I think this means that we cannot hot-delete any
> memory ranges presented at boot-time since acpi_memory_remove_memory()
> only calls remove_memory() when the enabled flag is set. Is that
> correct?"
>
> Above mention is correct. Thus even if memory device supports hotplug,
> memory presented at boot-time cannot be hot removed since the memory
> device's acpi_memory_info->enabled is always 0.
>
> This patch changes to set 1 to "acpi_memory_info->enabled" of memory
> device presented at boot-time for hot removing the memory device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>
> v2 : Changed a based kernel from linux-3.9-rc2 to linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.
>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> index d4f2eb8..ea78988 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> @@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (!result)
> - info->enabled = 1;
> + info->enabled = 1;
> +
> /*
> * Add num_enable even if add_memory() returns -EEXIST, so the
> * device is bound to this driver.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-ACPI-acpi_memhotplug-enable-acpi_memory_info-enabled.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1876 bytes --]
At http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=135769405622667&w=2 thread,
Toshi Kani mentioned as follows:
"I have a question about the change you made in commit 65479472 in
acpi_memhotplug.c. This change seems to require that
acpi_memory_enable_device() calls add_memory() to add all memory ranges
represented by memory device objects at boot-time, and keep the results
be used for hot-remove.
If I understand it right, this add_memory() call fails with EEXIST at
boot-time since all memory ranges should have been added from EFI memory
table (or e820) already. This results all memory ranges be marked as !
enabled & !failed. I think this means that we cannot hot-delete any
memory ranges presented at boot-time since acpi_memory_remove_memory()
only calls remove_memory() when the enabled flag is set. Is that
correct?"
Above mention is correct. Thus even if memory device supports hotplug,
memory presented at boot-time cannot be hot removed since the memory
device's acpi_memory_info->enabled is always 0.
This patch changes to set 1 to "acpi_memory_info->enabled" of memory
device presented at boot-time for hot removing the memory device.
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
v2 : Changed a based kernel from linux-3.9-rc2 to linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
index d4f2eb8..ea78988 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
@@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
continue;
}
- if (!result)
- info->enabled = 1;
+ info->enabled = 1;
+
/*
* Add num_enable even if add_memory() returns -EEXIST, so the
* device is bound to this driver.
--
1.7.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-13 6:54 [Bug fix PATCH] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: enable acpi_memory_info->enabled of memory device presented at boot-time Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-13 14:50 ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-18 2:19 ` [PATCH] Remove acpi_memory_info->failed bit Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-19 15:03 ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-20 23:57 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21 4:36 ` [Bug fix PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: enable acpi_memory_info->enabled of memory device presented at boot-time Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21 4:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: Remove acpi_memory_info->failed bit Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21 4:45 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-22 0:29 ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-22 1:35 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-22 1:53 ` [PATCH v3 " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-22 20:24 ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-25 23:57 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-26 13:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-27 23:58 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-04-01 23:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-02 0:12 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-04-02 12:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-02 23:55 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21 4:44 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514A903A.9000909@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox