public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>, rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com,
	wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug fix PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: enable acpi_memory_info->enabled of memory device presented at boot-time
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:44:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514A903A.9000909@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514A8E3C.1050902@jp.fujitsu.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2348 bytes --]

The mail's tab become spaces. So I attached origianl patch.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu

2013/03/21 13:36, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> At http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=135769405622667&w=2 thread,
> Toshi Kani mentioned as follows:
>
> "I have a question about the change you made in commit 65479472 in
> acpi_memhotplug.c.  This change seems to require that
> acpi_memory_enable_device() calls add_memory() to add all memory ranges
> represented by memory device objects at boot-time, and keep the results
> be used for hot-remove.
>
> If I understand it right, this add_memory() call fails with EEXIST at
> boot-time since all memory ranges should have been added from EFI memory
> table (or e820) already.  This results all memory ranges be marked as !
> enabled & !failed.  I think this means that we cannot hot-delete any
> memory ranges presented at boot-time since acpi_memory_remove_memory()
> only calls remove_memory() when the enabled flag is set.  Is that
> correct?"
>
> Above mention is correct. Thus even if memory device supports hotplug,
> memory presented at boot-time cannot be hot removed since the memory
> device's acpi_memory_info->enabled is always 0.
>
> This patch changes to set 1 to "acpi_memory_info->enabled" of memory
> device presented at boot-time for hot removing the memory device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>
> v2 : Changed a based kernel from linux-3.9-rc2 to linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.
>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |    4 ++--
>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> index d4f2eb8..ea78988 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> @@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
>               continue;
>           }
>
> -        if (!result)
> -            info->enabled = 1;
> +        info->enabled = 1;
> +
>           /*
>            * Add num_enable even if add_memory() returns -EEXIST, so the
>            * device is bound to this driver.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[-- Attachment #2: 0001-ACPI-acpi_memhotplug-enable-acpi_memory_info-enabled.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1876 bytes --]

At http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=135769405622667&w=2 thread,
Toshi Kani mentioned as follows:

"I have a question about the change you made in commit 65479472 in
acpi_memhotplug.c.  This change seems to require that
acpi_memory_enable_device() calls add_memory() to add all memory ranges
represented by memory device objects at boot-time, and keep the results
be used for hot-remove.

If I understand it right, this add_memory() call fails with EEXIST at
boot-time since all memory ranges should have been added from EFI memory
table (or e820) already.  This results all memory ranges be marked as !
enabled & !failed.  I think this means that we cannot hot-delete any
memory ranges presented at boot-time since acpi_memory_remove_memory()
only calls remove_memory() when the enabled flag is set.  Is that
correct?"

Above mention is correct. Thus even if memory device supports hotplug,
memory presented at boot-time cannot be hot removed since the memory
device's acpi_memory_info->enabled is always 0.

This patch changes to set 1 to "acpi_memory_info->enabled" of memory
device presented at boot-time for hot removing the memory device.

Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
---

v2 : Changed a based kernel from linux-3.9-rc2 to linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.

---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
index d4f2eb8..ea78988 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
@@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if (!result)
-			info->enabled = 1;
+		info->enabled = 1;
+
 		/*
 		 * Add num_enable even if add_memory() returns -EEXIST, so the
 		 * device is bound to this driver.
-- 
1.7.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-21  4:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-13  6:54 [Bug fix PATCH] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: enable acpi_memory_info->enabled of memory device presented at boot-time Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-13 14:50 ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-18  2:19   ` [PATCH] Remove acpi_memory_info->failed bit Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-19 15:03     ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-20 23:57       ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21  4:36         ` [Bug fix PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: enable acpi_memory_info->enabled of memory device presented at boot-time Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21  4:39           ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: Remove acpi_memory_info->failed bit Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21  4:45             ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-22  0:29             ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-22  1:35               ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-22  1:53               ` [PATCH v3 " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-22 20:24                 ` Toshi Kani
2013-03-25 23:57                   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-26 13:41                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-27 23:58                       ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-04-01 23:48                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-02  0:12                           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-04-02 12:57                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-02 23:55                               ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-21  4:44           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=514A903A.9000909@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox