From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Mokrejs Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Always resume devices on ACPI wakeup notifications Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:42:50 +0100 Message-ID: <51549D3A.3000406@fold.natur.cuni.cz> References: <2282655.IicBMMa6jN@vostro.rjw.lan> <2457825.yjlrJCricN@vostro.rjw.lan> <1433753.0tcctuHSKe@vostro.rjw.lan> <51547D45.6030106@fold.natur.cuni.cz> <20130328182326.GA5995@xanatos> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fold.natur.cuni.cz ([195.113.57.32]:52485 "HELO fold.natur.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751160Ab3C1Tmy (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:42:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas , Sarah Sharp Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Len Brown , Matthew Garrett Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Sarah Sharp >> >> Bjorn, I see that you're encouraging people to have their bugs and >> symptoms in a bug tracker. I've also been doing that within Intel, in a >> private JIRA issue tracker. I've been discussing if we can duplicate >> some bugs or features that don't contain Intel confidential information >> to a public JIRA at 01.org. I don't really want to use >> bugzilla.kernel.org because, quite frankly, the interface is archaic, >> and in the past I've gotten pushback from other devs about tracking >> "someday" features in there. > > My main concern is that often there's more information relevant to a > change than it makes sense to put in the changelog, so I like to > include a URL to that additional info. I don't really care if that's > for a mailing list archive, a bugzilla, a JIRA instance, etc. Issue > trackers are more convenient than mailing lists for collecting dmesg > logs, acpidumps, etc. The archaic bugzilla interface notwithstanding, > I'm not sure it would be an improvement to have a collection of dozens > of issue trackers controlled by random organizations. I'd rather have > a single place and confidence that it will stick around. What's wrong with bugzilla? It's nice and more appealing than Jira. From a user perspective I always found Jira ugly. sorry to say that. ;-) Martin