From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: Remove acpi_memory_info->failed bit Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:55:26 +0900 Message-ID: <515B6FEE.9000508@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <514022BF.3080303@jp.fujitsu.com> <7171436.IWIKuTHVjL@vostro.rjw.lan> <515A227C.3060009@jp.fujitsu.com> <2321578.IdtOOylV2Q@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:59102 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758045Ab3DBX4A (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 19:56:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2321578.IdtOOylV2Q@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Toshi Kani , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, 2013/04/02 21:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 09:12:44 AM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> 2013/04/02 8:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Thursday, March 28, 2013 08:58:03 AM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: >>>> Hi Rafael, >>>> >>>> 2013/03/26 22:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 08:57:05 AM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: >>>>>> 2013/03/23 5:24, Toshi Kani wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 10:53 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: >>>>>>>> acpi_memory_info has enabled bit and failed bit for controlling memory >>>>>>>> hotplug. But we don't need to keep both bits. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The patch removes acpi_memory_info->failed bit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: yasuaki ishimatsu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the update. It looks good. For the series: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Acked-by: Toshi Kani >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Both patches applied to linux-pm.git/linux-next. >>>> >>>> Thank you for applying both patches. >>>> If you don't mind, I hope these patches are merged into linux-3.9 >>>> since this is bug fix. >>> >>> I honestly don't think that [2/2] is 3.9 material, but I can push [1/2] >>> for 3.9 provided that you also regard it as material for 3.8-stable. >> >> linux-3.8 does not support physical memory hot remove. It has been supported >> since linux-3.9. So I don't need [1/2] patch to linux-3.8 but need it to >> linux-3.9. So please push [1/2] patch to linux-3.9. > > Well, I don't think it would be a good idea to push that patch for 3.9 so late > in the cycle. Yes, it would make memory hotplug work in 3.9, but that might > surprise some people and cause problems to happen as a result and we wouldn't > have the time to address them before the 3.9 release. > > If that's not a big problem, I'd prefer to defer that patch until the 3.10 > merge window is open (which is just about 2 weeks from now) and if need be we > can still push it for 3.9-stable afterward. Sorry for bothering you by my mention. I understood your thought. Please merge this patch to 3.10 and push if for 3.9-stable. Thanks, Yasuaki Ishimatsu > > Thanks, > Rafael > >