From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@fold.natur.cuni.cz>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in acpi_processor_add()
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 11:58:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A81FF9.8030403@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130530222542.GD1630@kroah.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1677 bytes --]
On 2013-5-31 6:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:29:54 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> On 2013-5-29 19:07, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>>>> Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>> On 2013-5-29 7:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>>> On Thursday, May 23, 2013 08:44:26 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>>>> In acpi_processor_add(), get_cpu_device() will return NULL sometimes,
>>>>>>> although the chances are small, I think it should be fixed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch isn't necessary any more after the changes queued up for 3.11
>>>>>> in the acpi-hotplug branch of the linux-pm.git tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I noticed your patch set, just drop my patch.
>>>>
>>>> But shouldn't this go to stable at least? I checked linux-3.9.4
>>>> and it applies fine. Whether this is relevant for other stable
>>>> series I will leave up to somebody else. ;)
>>>
>>> Hi Rafeal,
>>>
>>> What's your opinion on Martin's suggestion?
>>
>> Well, this is kind of hard to say. We generally don't apply patches to -stable
>> that don't have mainline counterparts.
>>
>> Greg, I wonder what your opinion is?
>
> We do not apply patches to -stable that are not in Linus's tree, unless
> there is no problem in Linus's tree due to a major rewrite of the code,
> and it has been confirmed that the same problem isn't there.
Hi Rafael,
I found that the problem is still there in your acpi-hotplug tree, sorry for
I didn't noticed early. I made a patch for this again, I hope it will make
sense to you.
The patch is attached, based on your acpi-hotplug tree.
Thanks
Hanjun
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-ACPI-processor-Fix-potential-NULL-pointer-dereferenc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1085 bytes --]
>From 975e30f5906a883e533e4226d8eca1c449c7366b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 11:36:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI / processor: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
in acpi_processor_add()
In acpi_processor_add(), get_cpu_device() will return NULL in some cases,
and ACPI_HANDLE_SET() just use the return dev directly, this will case a
potential NULL pointer dereference, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 587d2af..4466b36 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -389,6 +389,11 @@ static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device;
dev = get_cpu_device(pr->id);
+ if (!dev) {
+ result = -ENODEV;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
ACPI_HANDLE_SET(dev, pr->handle);
result = acpi_bind_one(dev, NULL);
if (result)
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-31 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-23 12:44 [PATCH] ACPI: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in acpi_processor_add() Hanjun Guo
2013-05-28 23:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-29 1:38 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-05-29 11:07 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-05-30 2:29 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-05-30 13:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-30 22:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-05-31 3:58 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2013-05-31 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A81FF9.8030403@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmokrejs@fold.natur.cuni.cz \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox