From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Naveen N. Rao" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4] mce: acpi/apei: Add a sysctl to control page offlining on firmware report Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:47:13 +0530 Message-ID: <51DD2699.7000804@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20130701153728.6197.14022.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20130702125137.7388.97225.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20130703144641.GC13951@pd.tnic> <51D44752.3000303@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F31C76B19@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F31C76B19@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: Borislav Petkov , "ananth@in.ibm.com" , "masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "lcm@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "Huang, Ying" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 07/09/2013 01:56 AM, Luck, Tony wrote: > I'm happy with just the acpi=nocmcff to avoid a BIOS that does weird > stuff. Or do you think we might still have to deal with a string of APEI > messages? Agreed - and I don't think this patch can help with a string of APEI messages either. So yes, I think we can leave this out for now. Thanks, Naveen