From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: "Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
"Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Ben Jencks" <ben@bjencks.net>, joeyli <jlee@suse.com>,
"Micael Dias" <kam1kaz3@gmail.com>,
"* SAMÍ *" <miaousami@hotmail.com>,
"Yves-Alexis Perez" <corsac@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] acpi_video: Don't handle ACPI brightness notifications by default
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 22:52:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FBC799.4070204@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1559797.9EdEoD0Bgy@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 08/02/2013 10:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, August 02, 2013 01:55:47 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On 03/08/2013 03:39 AM, Seth Forshee wrote:
>>> Windows 8 requires all backlight interfaces to report 101 brightness
>>> values, and as a result we're starting to see machines with that many
>>> brightness levels in _BCL. For machines which send these notifications
>>> when the brightness up/down keys are pressed this means a lot of key
>>> presses to get any kind of noticeable change in brightness.
>>>
>>> For a while now we've had the ability to disable in-kernel handling of
>>> notifications via the video.brightness_switch_enabled parameter. Change
>>> this to default to off, and let userspace choose more reasonable
>>> increments for changing the brightness.
>>
>> I just found one more reason for this param to default 0.
>
> Do you mean video.brightness_switch_enabled?
Yes.
>
>> We are going to separate the backlight interface control and event
>> notification functionalities of the ACPI video module, it is highly
>> possible a lot of systems will use a combination of the event
>> notification handler and intel_backlight interface. So it doesn't make
>> sense to let video module to do any adjustment on its own if user space
>> has chosen a different interface to use. Actually, it can cause problems
>> as in ASUS's case:
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52951
>>
>> The problem there is, on hotkey brightness up, the video module will
>> adjust the brightness level first and since its _BQC is broken, it gets
>> a wrong number(too low or too high or whatever) and then does the _BCM
>> call. The _BCM method works. Then user space picks the intel_backlight
>> to do the adjustment, but since the _BCM already sets a wrong value, the
>> user space's adjustment is affected too. The result is, user has only
>> two visible levels, very low and very high.
>>
>> This only occurs on -rc3, since we removed the
>> acpi_video_verify_backlight_support from acpi_video_switch_brightness
>> function.
>
> What did we do before -rc2? Did we address that in any way?
No, before rc2, backlight is broken on that system.
In rc2, we added the win8 patch and a fix patch for the hotkey, then
the ACPI video module's backlight control and in kernel brightness
handling is disabled. With the working hotkey and intel_backlight, rc2
works for the system. Then with the revert in rc3, user needs to choose
intel_backlight in xorg.conf but the in kernel brightness handling from
ACPI video module is back. Since video module is broken, it breaks the
backlight hotkey functionality.
Thanks,
Aaron
>
>> So either we make this param default to 0, or we make a new
>> function to avoid brightness switch in video module for Win8 systems.
>>
>> I prefer to set this param to 0 by default. What do you guys think?
>
> That depends on what we did earlier.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-02 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-11 16:21 [PATCH] ACPI: Disable Windows 8 compatibility for some Lenovo ThinkPads Seth Forshee
2013-02-11 17:52 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-02-11 19:06 ` Seth Forshee
2013-02-11 19:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-02-11 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-12 3:05 ` Seth Forshee
2013-02-13 20:32 ` Seth Forshee
2013-02-13 20:55 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-02-13 21:04 ` Ben Jencks
2013-02-13 21:49 ` Seth Forshee
2013-02-13 21:46 ` Seth Forshee
2013-02-13 21:54 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-02-13 22:04 ` Seth Forshee
2013-03-07 19:38 ` Seth Forshee
2013-03-07 19:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] ACPICA: Add interface for getting latest Windows version requested via _OSI Seth Forshee
2013-03-07 19:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] acpi_video: Avoid unnecessary conversions between backlight levels and indexes Seth Forshee
2013-03-07 19:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] acpi_video: Add workaround for broken Windows 8 backlight implementations Seth Forshee
2013-04-04 11:44 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-04 12:35 ` Seth Forshee
2013-04-04 13:46 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-04 14:02 ` Seth Forshee
2013-04-04 14:27 ` Aaron Lu
2013-03-07 19:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] acpi_video: Disable use of _BQC when value doesn't match those set through _BCM Seth Forshee
2013-03-07 19:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] acpi_video: Don't handle ACPI brightness notifications by default Seth Forshee
2013-08-02 5:55 ` Aaron Lu
2013-08-02 14:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-02 14:52 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2013-08-03 0:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 9:46 ` Aaron Lu
2013-08-03 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 12:10 ` Aaron Lu
2013-08-03 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-04 1:08 ` Aaron Lu
2013-03-18 21:25 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Disable Windows 8 compatibility for some Lenovo ThinkPads Seth Forshee
2013-04-02 5:18 ` Ben Jencks
2013-04-02 9:15 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-02 11:23 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-04-02 13:44 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-02 19:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-04-19 12:24 ` Seth Forshee
2013-04-20 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-21 2:29 ` Seth Forshee
2013-04-21 15:46 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-02-13 21:09 ` Ben Jencks
2013-04-01 1:53 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-01 13:03 ` Seth Forshee
2013-04-02 9:08 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-02 13:00 ` Seth Forshee
2013-04-02 13:43 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-03 7:04 ` Ben Jencks
2013-04-03 7:27 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-03 13:45 ` Seth Forshee
2013-04-04 11:39 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-19 3:15 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-20 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-21 11:07 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-21 12:11 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-21 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-22 9:39 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-22 11:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-22 12:11 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-22 13:06 ` Seth Forshee
2013-04-22 13:40 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-22 13:56 ` Seth Forshee
2013-04-22 14:07 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-22 15:11 ` Seth Forshee
2013-04-22 2:18 ` joeyli
2013-04-22 10:08 ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-22 12:00 ` joeyli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51FBC799.4070204@intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=ben@bjencks.net \
--cc=corsac@debian.org \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=kam1kaz3@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaousami@hotmail.com \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).