From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Prarit Bhargava Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi, acpi_pci_irq_enable must return an error if ACPI cannot map an IRQ. Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 08:39:02 -0400 Message-ID: <52023FE6.9010503@redhat.com> References: <1373900260-1599-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> <20130805140416.GA3882@xps8300> <52010A40.1040409@redhat.com> <86005101.W2j5ifU8yA@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <86005101.W2j5ifU8yA@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Heikki Krogerus , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , Bjorn Helgaas , Myron Stowe , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 08/06/2013 06:44 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:37:52 AM Prarit Bhargava wrote: >> On 08/05/2013 10:04 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:30:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>> On Sunday, August 04, 2013 07:35:37 PM Prarit Bhargava wrote: >>>>> Hey Rafael, >>>>> >>>>> I know you're busy but I was just wondering if this was queued up anywhere or if >>>>> you had any other questions? >>>> >>>> Should be qeued up for 3.12 (currently in linux-next). >>> >>> This breaks my xHCI :( >>> >>> If the issues is that you are not getting any interrupt, then should >>> it not be checked separately and only fail in that case? I'm attaching >>> a patch that I made on top of linux-next, where I do just that. Would >>> that work for you? >>> >> >> Testing this right now ... I'll get back to everyone when I have results. > > In the meantime I've dropped that commit from linux-next as it caused the xHCI > breakage to happen. Thanks Rafael. Heikki, I tested your patch and found that it solves my problem. Sorry for the breakage :( Can you add a Tested-by: Prarit Bhargava to your patch? Thanks, P.