From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mem-hotplug: Introduce movablenode boot option
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:24:48 +0800
Message-ID: <5241AEC0.6040505@gmail.com>
References: <524162DA.30004@cn.fujitsu.com> <5241655E.1000007@cn.fujitsu.com> <20130924124121.GG2366@htj.dyndns.org> <5241944B.4050103@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <5241944B.4050103@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, lenb@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, mingo@elte.hu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>, Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>, Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kern>
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

Hello tejun,

On 09/24/2013 09:31 PM, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
>> This came up during earlier review but never was addressed.  Is
>> > "movablenode" the right name?  Shouldn't it be something which
>> > explicitly shows that it's to prepare for memory hotplug?  Also, maybe
>> > the above param should generate warning if CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE isn't
>> > enabled?
> hmmm...as for the option name, if this option is set, it means, the kernel
> could support the functionality that a whole node is the so called
> movable node, which only has ZONE MOVABLE zone in it. So we choose
> to name the parameter "movablenode".
> 
> As for the warning, will add it.

I am now preparing the v5 version. Only in this patch we haven't come to an
agreement. So as for the boot option name, after my explanation, do you still
have the objection? Or you could suggest a good name for us, that'll be
very thankful:)

Thanks.

-- 
Thanks.
Zhang Yanfei