From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug report] Warning when hot-add an ACPI0004 device.
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:31:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5242BB6D.3060504@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378998712.12538.18.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Hi Toshi,
On 09/12/2013 11:11 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 13:00 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>> Hi Rafael, Toshi,
>>
>> When we hot-add an ACPI0004 device, we got the following warning:
>>
>> acpi ACPI0004:01: Attempt to re-insert
>>
>> The ACPI0004 device is a System Board in Fujitsu server, which has two
>> numa nodes (processors and memory).
>>
>> It seems that we reserved the ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK event twice in
>> acpi_hotplug_notify_cb().
>>
>>
>> According to bisect, this happens after the following commit:
>>
>> From 68a67f6c78b80525d9b3c6672e7782de95e56a83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:05:55 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI / container: Use common hotplug code
>>
>> Switch the ACPI container driver to using common device hotplug code
>> introduced previously. This reduces the driver down to a trivial
>> definition and registration of a struct acpi_scan_handler object.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
>> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/container.c | 146
>> ++++-------------------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> I'm now investigating this problem. If you have any idea about why this
>> happens, please let me know.
>
> With the above change, container devices use the common notify handler,
> which logs the warning message in question when it receives device check
> twice on a same device. Before the change, the container-specific
> notify handler did not log this message in the same case (but considered
> it as an eject request).
>
> So, I suspect that you are getting device check twice regardless of the
> kernel change. Can you check KERN_DEBUG messages to see if that is the
> case? The notify handler logs all events with KERN_DEBUG.
Follow your suggestion, we confirm that it really received ACPI_NOTIFY_
DEVICE_CHECK event*twice*, but the original ACPI container driver only
received once, does the common device hotplug code introduce another device
check? any idea?
Container uses common device hotplug code:
[ 142.937724] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth8: link becomes ready
[ 674.975575] ACPI: \_SB_.LSB1: ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK event <<<<
[ 674.991604] ACPI: \_SB_.LSB1: ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK event <<<<
[ 675.613990] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [UNC2] (domain 0000 [bus fd])
[ 675.684970] acpi PNP0A03:01: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
[ 675.780957] acpi PNP0A03:01: Unable to request _OSC control (_OSC support mask: 0x08)
[ 675.874806] ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM
[ 675.949005] pci_bus 0000:fd: Allocating resources
[ 675.960145] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [UNC3] (domain 0000 [bus fc])
[ 676.031176] acpi PNP0A03:02: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
[ 676.127129] acpi PNP0A03:02: Unable to request _OSC control (_OSC support mask: 0x08)
[ 676.220943] ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM
[ 676.295019] pci_bus 0000:fc: Allocating resources
Original ACPI container driver:
[ 1526.122933] Container driver received ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK event <<<<
[ 1526.800646] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [UNC2] (domain 0000 [bus fd])
[ 1526.871682] acpi PNP0A03:01: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
[ 1526.967878] acpi PNP0A03:01: Unable to request _OSC control (_OSC support mask: 0x08)
[ 1527.061891] ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM
[ 1527.136036] pci_bus 0000:fd: Allocating resources
[ 1527.150747] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [UNC3] (domain 0000 [bus fc])
[ 1527.221821] acpi PNP0A03:02: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
[ 1527.317738] acpi PNP0A03:02: Unable to request _OSC control (_OSC support mask: 0x08)
[ 1527.411795] ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM
[ 1527.485917] pci_bus 0000:fc: Allocating resources
Thanks,
Gu
>
> Thanks,
> -Toshi
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-12 5:00 [Bug report] Warning when hot-add an ACPI0004 device Tang Chen
2013-09-12 15:11 ` Toshi Kani
2013-09-25 10:31 ` Gu Zheng [this message]
2013-09-25 14:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-26 2:33 ` Gu Zheng
2013-09-25 22:24 ` Toshi Kani
2013-09-26 2:33 ` Gu Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5242BB6D.3060504@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox