linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/Power: Check physical device's runtime pm status before requesting to resume it
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:58:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <525D03B4.8050709@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1761658.DWcBvZSdOl@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 2013年10月11日 19:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, October 11, 2013 04:16:25 PM tianyu.lan@intel.com wrote:
>> From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
>>
>> Currently, when one power resource is turned on, devices owning it
>> will be requested to resume regardless of their runtime pm status.
>> ACPI power resource maybe turn on in some devices' runtime pm
>> resume callback(E.G, usb port) while turning on the power resource
>> will trigger one new resume request of the device. It causes
>> infinite loop between resume and suspend. This has happened on
>> clearing usb port's PM Qos NO_POWER_OFF flag twice. This patch is
>> to add check of physical device's runtime pm status and request resume
>> if the device is suspended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/power.c | 6 ++++--
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/power.c b/drivers/acpi/power.c
>> index 0dbe5cd..228c138 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/power.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/power.c
>> @@ -250,8 +250,10 @@ static void acpi_power_resume_dependent(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>>  	mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
>>
>> -	list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->physical_node_list, node)
>> -		pm_request_resume(pn->dev);
>> +	list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->physical_node_list, node) {
>> +		if (pm_runtime_suspended(pn->dev))
>> +			pm_request_resume(pn->dev);
>> +	}
>
> This is racy, because the status may change right after you check it and before
> you call pm_request_resume().

Yes, the runtime status may be changed just after the check.

>
> Besides, pm_request_resume() checks the status of the device and won't
> try to resume it if it is not suspended.
>

For this issue, usb port is in the RPM_SUSPENDING state when
pm_request_resume() is called. The deferred_resume will be set to true
during this procedure and trigger resume after finishing suspend. USB
port runtime resume callback will turn on its power resource again and
the work of acpi_power_resume_dependent() is scheduled. Because the usb
port's usage count remains zero, it's to be suspended soon. When
pm_request_resume() of acpi_power_resume_dependent() is called, the usb
port is always in the PRM_SUSPENDING. Fall in the loop of suspend and
resume.

How about running acpi_power_dependent when turning on power resource 
rather than scheduling a work to run it?  After this, 
pm_request_resume() can check device's right status just after turning 
on power resource. Furthermore, pm_request_resume() is async resume and 
this change will not consume much time.

>>
>>  	list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->power_dependent, node)
>>  		pm_request_resume(pn->dev);
>
> Thanks!
>


-- 
Best regards
Tianyu Lan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-15  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-11  8:16 [PATCH] ACPI/Power: Check physical device's runtime pm status before requesting to resume it tianyu.lan
2013-10-11 11:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-15  8:58   ` Lan Tianyu [this message]
2013-10-15 21:22     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-16  7:12       ` Lan Tianyu
2013-10-16  8:57       ` Lan Tianyu
2013-10-16  9:26       ` Lan Tianyu
2013-10-16 12:42         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-17  1:02           ` Lan Tianyu
2013-10-17  2:40             ` Lan Tianyu
2013-10-17  8:50               ` Lan Tianyu
2013-10-17 11:38               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-18 13:05                 ` Lan Tianyu
2013-10-18 17:54                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=525D03B4.8050709@intel.com \
    --to=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).