From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
To: Lan Tianyu <lantianyu1986@gmail.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger kernel org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: remove unused ACPI_PROCFS Kconfig param
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:22:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526E0293.4080702@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOLK0pxe0tsgo1+U8WT4-9cxTxS9MKaiGhLd2S-T-T7imPyd7A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Lan,
Thank you very much for this review!
On 10/28/2013 07:13 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> 2013/10/27 Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>:
>> This patch removes the ACPI_PROCFS parameter
>> (support for legacy /proc/acpi), which is defined
>> but no longer used anywhere in the makefiles and source code.
>>
> I think this should be not removed now. Since there are still interfaces
> under /proc/acpi (E.G, /proc/acpi/wakeup and /proc/acpi/lid/*).
>
> The origin commit which introduces the kconfig is to make some
> interfaces that have backup interfaces in the sysfs configurable before
> removing them actually.
>
> So we still need this kconfig when try to remove remaining /proc/acpi
> interfaces.
I agree that keeping this legacy interface would still be useful.
However, CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS is no longer used anywhere, neither in
Makefiles nor in the source code. ACPI_PROCFS isn't event used in
Kconfig files as an intermediate dependency.
What I deduce from that is that even if you set CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y in
the kernel configuration, this will have no impact at all.
That's why I proposed to remove this Kconfig parameter.
Another option would be to fix the issue, and get CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS to
be properly taken into account again.
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Opdenacker, CEO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
+33 484 258 098
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-28 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-27 6:56 [PATCH] ACPI: remove unused ACPI_PROCFS Kconfig param Michael Opdenacker
2013-10-28 6:13 ` Lan Tianyu
2013-10-28 6:22 ` Michael Opdenacker [this message]
2013-10-28 8:27 ` Paul Bolle
2013-10-28 8:42 ` Michael Opdenacker
2013-10-29 5:51 ` Lan Tianyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526E0293.4080702@free-electrons.com \
--to=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
--cc=lantianyu1986@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox