linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	"al.stone@linaro.org" <al.stone@linaro.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
	Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] ACPI: introduce CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE to enable this ACPI mode
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:02:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5295B541.5070902@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E880248D268@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Hi Lv,

Sorry for the late reply, I have some comments below.

On 2013-11-25 16:14, Zheng, Lv wrote:
[...]
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE
>>>>> +#define ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE TRUE
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you put this here because of my previous wrong comment.
>>>>
>>>> For ACPICA environments that work like Kconfigs for Linux, it is good to define them before including any ACPICA files.
>>>> While putting things here cannot cover <asm/acpi.h>.
>>>
>>> Good catch! thanks for the reminding.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Normally, I will do:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>>>
>>>> /* some comment */
>>>> (one empty line as ACPICA enforces 1 empty line after 1 line comment and no empty lines after a block of comments)
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE
>>>> #define ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE(spaces not tabs here according to ACPICA's coding style)TRUE
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> #include <linux/string.h>
>>>
>>> There is a problem when I try yours suggestion, it is a compiling warning:
>>>
>>> warning: "TRUE" is not defined
>>>
>>> And I find that "TRUE" is defined in include/acpi/actypes.
>>>
>>> So, is this ok to you?
>>
>> ... How ugly the TRUE is.
>> OK, you can keep your original code as this is really not a real issue, just a tricky point.
>> I'll try to offer a cleanup after another ACPICA cleanup that tries to modify all "#if" condition related TRUE into "1" in ACPICA.
> 
> I checked ACPICA code base and found there is really nothing need to be cleaned up.
> 
> Why not:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE
> +#define ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE 1
> +#endif

In include/acpi/acconfig.h:

#ifndef ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE
#define ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE           FALSE
#endif

In order to make the code consistent, I used "TRUE" here.

But it is ok to me to use "1" here, will update in next version.

Thanks
Hanjun

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-27  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-10  1:36 [PATCH 00/12] Hardware Reduced Mode cleanup for ACPI al.stone
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 01/12] ACPI: introduce CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE to enable this ACPI mode al.stone
2013-11-17 22:29   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]     ` <CAGHbJ3ArVr+4g8UHyxFSL9Bu2ehsUAqsapGuxYLgfoR4NfT02w@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-18 13:24       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]         ` <CAGHbJ3DkXQ1-kQSdzXZ7=YSNhTstebGrdX4qXygBWmh2vYe0Bw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-18 13:37           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-19  7:32             ` Hanjun Guo
2013-11-19 13:10               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20  1:30                 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-11-22  6:14   ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-22  9:56     ` Hanjun Guo
2013-11-25  7:43       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-25  8:14         ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-27  9:02           ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 02/12] ACPI: bus master reload not supported in reduced HW mode al.stone
2013-11-17 21:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20 21:11     ` Al Stone
2013-11-21  0:31       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 03/12] ACPI: clean up compiler warning about uninitialized field al.stone
2013-11-17 21:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20 21:13     ` Al Stone
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 04/12] ACPI: HW reduced mode does not allow use of the FADT sci_interrupt field al.stone
2013-11-17 22:06   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20 21:24     ` Al Stone
2013-11-21  0:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-21 19:36         ` Al Stone
2013-11-21 21:36           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-21 22:19             ` Al Stone
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 05/12] ACPI: ARM: exclude calls on ARM platforms, not include them on x86 al.stone
2013-11-17 22:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20 21:25     ` Al Stone
2013-11-22  6:19   ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 06/12] ACPI: ensure several FADT fields are only used in HW reduced mode al.stone
2013-11-22  6:05   ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-22  6:26     ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 07/12] ACPI: do not reserve memory regions for some FADT entries " al.stone
2013-11-17 22:15   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20 21:27     ` Al Stone
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 08/12] ACPI: in HW reduced mode, getting power latencies from FADT is not allowed al.stone
2013-11-17 22:17   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20 21:48     ` Al Stone
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 09/12] ACPI: add clarifying comment about processor throttling in HW reduced mode al.stone
2013-11-17 22:20   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20 21:54     ` Al Stone
2013-11-21  0:14       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-21 23:11         ` Al Stone
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 10/12] ACPI: ACPI_FADT_C2_MP_SUPPORTED must be ignored " al.stone
2013-11-17 22:24   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20 21:55     ` Al Stone
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 11/12] ACPI: use of ACPI_FADT_32BIT_TIMER is not allowed " al.stone
2013-11-17 22:26   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20 22:15     ` Al Stone
2013-11-21 23:43       ` Al Stone
2013-11-22 12:08         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-10  1:36 ` [PATCH 12/12] ACPI: correct #ifdef so compilation without ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE works al.stone
2013-11-17 22:28   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20 22:17     ` Al Stone
2013-11-17 21:47 ` [PATCH 00/12] Hardware Reduced Mode cleanup for ACPI Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5295B541.5070902@linaro.org \
    --to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=ahs3@redhat.com \
    --cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).