From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] Support timezone of ACPI TAD and EFI TIME Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:15:28 -0800 Message-ID: <52B4C180.40904@zytor.com> References: <1387439053-8711-1-git-send-email-jlee@suse.com> <1387512357.3539.4317.camel@linux-s257.site> <52B3C5F0.1060303@zytor.com> <1775986.qxTh3ADDRn@skinner> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1775986.qxTh3ADDRn@skinner> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thomas Renninger Cc: joeyli , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alessandro Zummo , Matt Fleming , Matthew Garrett , Elliott-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, samer.el-haj-mahmoud-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, Oliver Neukum , werner-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org, JBeulich-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Borislav Petkov List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 12/20/2013 02:53 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Thursday, December 19, 2013 08:22:08 PM H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 12/19/2013 08:05 PM, joeyli wrote: >>> Then that means the priority of PNP0B0x is higher then "CMOS RTC Not >>> Present" flag. ACPI spec doesn't have clear definition on this. >> >> According to the Microsoft requirements documents, such a platform is >> broken and shouldn't exist. > > Is this a public document? > Probably not but if, a pointer in this thread would help. > Does Microsoft mention ACPI Time and Alarm Device interface in > such a document already? > This is the document... I can't remember who sent me the link to it: http://goo.gl/R7S9Mk -hpa