From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hanjun Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of _PDC related for ARM64 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:43:15 +0800 Message-ID: <52E27C03.8090903@linaro.org> References: <1389961514-13562-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1389961514-13562-4-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <52D93D4E.5020605@arm.com> <52DCEA66.90903@linaro.org> <20140123161918.GA25927@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:43452 "EHLO mail-pa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752359AbaAXOnY (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:43:24 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fa1so3348526pad.14 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:43:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140123161918.GA25927@localhost> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Will Deacon , Russell King - ARM Linux , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Matthew Garrett , Olof Johansson , Linus Walleij , Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Arnd Bergmann , "patches@linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , Charles Garcia-Tobin On 2014=E5=B9=B401=E6=9C=8824=E6=97=A5 00:19, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:20:38AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2014-1-17 22:25, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>> On 17/01/14 12:24, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c >>>> @@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void) >>>> local_fiq_enable(); >>>> } >>>> =20 >>>> +unsigned long boot_option_idle_override =3D IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE; >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override); >>>> + >>> This is what I mentioned in other email. Do we really foresee use o= f this in >>> ARM64 or it's just added to avoid build issues ? >> Just avoid build issues, can not foresee use of this in ARM64 :) > So ideally we should look for a better solution here. Ok, I will try my best. Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html