From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lan Tianyu Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/Processor: Rework processor throttling with work_on_cpu() Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:27:55 +0800 Message-ID: <530B109B.5020901@intel.com> References: <20140220151721.GB32719@redhat.com> <1392960945-30741-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> <20140221100630.GA1121@krava.brq.redhat.com> <20140221170709.GC1121@krava.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:31818 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751509AbaBXJdw (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 04:33:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140221170709.GC1121@krava.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Olsa Cc: tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2014=E5=B9=B402=E6=9C=8822=E6=97=A5 01:07, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:06:30AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:35:45PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: >>> acpi_processor_set_throttling() uses set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to make >>> sure struct acpi_processor->acpi_processor_set_throttling() callbac= k >>> run on associated cpu. But the function maybe called in a worker wh= ich >>> has been bound to a cpu. The patch is to replace set_cpus_allowed_p= tr() >>> with work_on_cpu(). >> >> testing the new patch.. so far so good ;-) >=20 > ook.. survived whole day under the test workload without the warning = ;-) >=20 > jirka >=20 Hi Jirka: Great. Thanks for test:). --=20 Best regards Tianyu Lan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html