Re: [REGRESSION 3.14-rc6] Samsung N150 lid does not "open" after suspend to RAM.

Stefan Biereigel
2014-03-24T11:19:22Z

Hi,
thank you for the suggestion. The patch resolves the issue on my N150
when applied to a clean 3.14-rc7. Anyways I'm wondering if similar
problems to mine now exist on the Samsung Series 7/9 notebooks?

Is any further action from my part required?

Regards,
Stefan

Am 24.03.2014 10:30, schrieb Lan Tianyu:
> Please try the following patch.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> index d7d32c2..9239527 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> @@ -1027,8 +1027,13 @@ static struct dmi_system_id ec_dmi_table[] __initdata = {
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTek Computer Inc."),
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "L4R"),}, NULL},
> {
> - ec_clear_on_resume, "Samsung hardware", {
> - DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.")}, NULL},
> + ec_clear_on_resume, "Samsung NP530U3B", {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH"),}, NULL},
> + {
> + ec_clear_on_resume, "Samsung NP530U3C", {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "530U3C/530U4C/532U3C"),}, NULL},
> {},
> };
>
>
>
>
> 2014-03-24 15:50 GMT+08:00 Stefan Biereigel <security@biereigel-wb.de>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> starting with 3.14-rc6, the lid on my Samsung N150 behaves weird: My
>> system is set up, so that it should suspend to RAM as soon as the lid is
>> closed. Beginning with 3.14-rc6, the lid goes from "open" to "closed"
>> correctly the first time (and the system suspends), but after resuming
>> from standby (by opening the lid), the lid does not change to "open" again.
>> Of course, closing the lid again does not induce suspend to RAM then.
>> Opening the lid now (while not sleeping), makes ACPI notify the opening,
>> so I guess ACPI "misses" or discards the lid open event from the EC when
>> coming from sleep.
>> Now, closing the lid again does induce suspend to RAM. This behaviour is
>> reproducible: every other time, suspending works.
>>
>> This behaviour seems to be introduced by commit ad332c8a: ACPI / EC:
>> Clear stale EC events on Samsung systems.
>> Which was introduced after 3.14-rc5.
>>
>> When opening the lid to resume from standby, i see in dmesg:
>> Mar 23 22:12:04 little1 kernel: [ 7630.932074] ACPI : EC: 1 stale EC
>> events cleared
>> (which comes from drivers/acpi/ec.c)
>>
>> Seems to me, that the "open" event is cleared from the EC, but also
>> discarded instead of passed on. Shouldn't the correct behaviour be to
>> report all the pending events, read from the EC, as ACPI events? Can you
>> point me in a direction for fixing the issue cleanly, then I will try to
>> find a solution and prepare a patch for this issue.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Stefan
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>