From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/15] leds: leds-gpio: Add ACPI probing support Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:01:34 +0200 Message-ID: <5364565.aEcZqpzdLW@wuerfel> References: <1410868367-11056-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <2780318.hxubhI9Rvq@wuerfel> <20141001091309.GY1786@lahna.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:50820 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750997AbaJAKBo (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 06:01:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20141001091309.GY1786@lahna.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Dmitry Torokhov , Bryan Wu , Lee Jones , Grant Likely , Aaron Lu , Darren Hart On Wednesday 01 October 2014 12:13:09 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > Regarding the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE, I suspect the above won't work the > > way you are hoping for, because once you get to dozens or hundreds of > > drivers doing this, each device will show up with the same string, > > so udev will try to load all the modules that list "PRP0001". That > > doesn't look right. With the code from patch 3, you can probably drop > > the acpi MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() entirely and get the correct behavior. > > It actually works like this now: > > # cd /sys/bus/platform/devices/PRP0001\:00/ > DRIVER=leds-gpio > MODALIAS=of:Nprp0001TacpiCgpio-leds > > # cat modalias > of:Nprp0001TacpiCgpio-leds > > In other words the modalias changes to be of:Nprp0001Tacpi, e.g > name=prp0001, type=acpi and then list of compatible values. > > Udev then loads only module that matches the modalias so it should not > load everything listing PRP0001 in their MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(). I'm not completely following yet. I can see how this works now, but how is this better than just using the existing modalias for OF? Arnd