From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: changing acpi-video brightness_switch_enabled default to 0
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 10:55:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5365AC0B.4010300@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4392622.hgzIWDcxEe@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 05/02/2014 07:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, May 02, 2014 11:32:15 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was already considering asking for $subject for a while, but I did not see
>> any bug reports caused by it so I didn't ask. Until today I discovered that
>> I'm not seeing any bugs because Fedora is carrying a kernel patch
>> changing the default.
>>
>> A quick google search for brightness_switch_enabled OTOH reveals that for
>> other distros it is a serious problem, see ie:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/527157
>> http://askubuntu.com/questions/173921/why-does-my-thinkpad-brightness-control-skip-steps
>>
>> The problem is that acpi-video is unique in that it not only generates
>> brightness up/down keypresses, but also (sometimes) actively changes the
>> brightness itself.
>>
>> This presents an inconsistent kernel interface to userspace, basically there
>> are 2 different scenarios, depending on the laptop model:
>>
>> 1) On some laptops a brightness up/down keypress means: show a brightness osd
>> with the current brightness, iow it is a brightness has changed notification.
>>
>> 2) Where as on (a lot of) other laptops it means a brightness up/down key was
>> pressed, deal with it.
>>
>> Most of the desktop environments interpret any press as in scenario 2, and
>> change the brightness up / down as a response to the key events, causing it
>> to be changed twice, once by acpi-video and once by the DE.
>>
>> With the new default for video.use_native_backlight we will be moving even
>> more laptops over to behaving as in scenario 2. Making the remaining laptops
>> even more of a weird exception. Also note that it is hard to detect scenario
>> 1 properly in userspace, and AFAIK none of the DE-s deasls with it.
>>
>> Therefor I would like to propose to change the brightness_switch_enabled
>> default to 0.
>
> Aaron, what do you think about that?
Personally, I like this.
Last time I remembered, people who do not use GUI or use a simple GUI which
does not provide handling of backlight events prefer to having this param
default to 1(and they have a working acpi_video interface of course). But I
suppose most people are using a GUI that handles such events and the in
kernel handling of backlight events is indeed unique for acpi_video and
cause in consistence with other backlight control interfaces, I think it is
a good thing to set brightness_switch_enabled to 0 by default.
Thanks,
Aaron
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-04 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-02 9:32 RFC: changing acpi-video brightness_switch_enabled default to 0 Hans de Goede
2014-05-02 11:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-04 2:55 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5365AC0B.4010300@intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).