From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
bp@suse.de, m.chehab@samsung.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] acpi, apei, ghes: Make unmapping functionality independent from architecture.
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:32:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5373625B.4050401@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140513201118.GF8760@pd.tnic>
On 13.05.2014 22:11, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:14:34PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> Till now __flush_tlb_one was used for unmapping virtual memory which
>> is x86 specific function. Replace it with more generic
>> flush_tlb_kernel_range.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index aaf8db3..624878b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static void ghes_iounmap_nmi(void __iomem *vaddr_ptr)
>>
>> BUG_ON(vaddr != (unsigned long)GHES_IOREMAP_NMI_PAGE(base));
>> unmap_kernel_range_noflush(vaddr, PAGE_SIZE);
>> - __flush_tlb_one(vaddr);
>> + flush_tlb_kernel_range(vaddr, vaddr + PAGE_SIZE);
>> }
>>
>> static void ghes_iounmap_irq(void __iomem *vaddr_ptr)
>> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static void ghes_iounmap_irq(void __iomem *vaddr_ptr)
>>
>> BUG_ON(vaddr != (unsigned long)GHES_IOREMAP_IRQ_PAGE(base));
>> unmap_kernel_range_noflush(vaddr, PAGE_SIZE);
>> - __flush_tlb_one(vaddr);
>> + flush_tlb_kernel_range(vaddr, vaddr + PAGE_SIZE);
>
> flush_tlb_kernel_range() does send an IPI to every core on x86 which is
> much more expensive than what __flush_tlb_one does.
>
> Fairer it would be if you added a __flush_tlb_one() version for arm
> which does flush_tlb_kernel_range for you.
>
Thanks for comment. I am not sure if maintainers will allow me to add
sth like __flush_tlb_one() for arm/arm64. Let me ask them directly.
Catalin, Russell what do you think?
Regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-14 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-09 15:14 [PATCH 0/7] APEI: Make APEI architecture independent Tomasz Nowicki
2014-04-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] apei, mce: Call MCE-specific code only for X86 architecture Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-05 11:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-05 14:34 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-05 14:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-05 15:32 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-05 15:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-05 15:36 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-04-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] acpi, apei, ghes: Introduce more generic mechanism to init/deinit GHES error notifications Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-13 18:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-15 14:31 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-21 18:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] ACPI, APEI, GHES: Introduce ACPI_APEI_NMI to make NMI error notification a GHES feature Tomasz Nowicki
2014-04-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] acpi, apei, ghes: Factor out NMI error notification context Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-13 19:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-23 12:06 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-23 16:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-26 13:26 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-26 13:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-26 14:02 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-04-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] acpi, apei, ghes: Attach NMI init/deinit functions while CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_NMI is enabled Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-13 19:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] acpi, apei, ghes: Make unmapping functionality independent from architecture Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-13 20:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-14 12:32 ` Tomasz Nowicki [this message]
2014-05-14 12:35 ` Will Deacon
2014-05-14 12:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-14 12:48 ` Will Deacon
2014-05-14 12:52 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-14 13:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] acpi, apei, ghes: Factor out ioremap virtual memory for IRQ and NMI context Tomasz Nowicki
2014-05-14 17:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-05 9:25 ` [PATCH 0/7] APEI: Make APEI architecture independent Tomasz Nowicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5373625B.4050401@linaro.org \
--to=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).