From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hanjun Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse FADT table to get PSCI flags for PSCI init Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:13:46 +0800 Message-ID: <53F33F7A.7030307@linaro.org> References: <1407166105-17675-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1407166105-17675-6-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20140818142721.GR20043@localhost> <53F2C983.8000800@linaro.org> <20140819111000.GG3302@leverpostej> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:36455 "EHLO mail-pa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751569AbaHSMPT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:15:19 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id rd3so9991888pab.40 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:15:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140819111000.GG3302@leverpostej> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , Daniel Lezcano , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Robert Richter , Lv Zheng , Robert Moore , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Liviu Dudau , Randy Dunlap , Charles Garcia-Tobin , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" On 2014-8-19 19:10, Mark Rutland wrote: >>>> @@ -47,6 +49,26 @@ void __init __acpi_unmap_table(char *map, unsigned long size) >>>> early_memunmap(map, size); >>>> } >>>> >>>> +static int __init acpi_parse_fadt(struct acpi_table_header *table) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table; >>>> + >>>> + /* >>>> + * Revision in table header is the FADT Major version, >>>> + * and there is a minor version of FADT which was introduced >>>> + * by ACPI 5.1, we only deal with ACPI 5.1 or higher version >>>> + * to get arm boot flags, or we will disable ACPI. >>>> + */ >>>> + if (table->revision < 5 || fadt->minor_revision < 1) { >>> >>> If we ever get revision 6.0, this would trigger. >> >> Yes, good catch, actually I already fixed that in my local git repo, >> >> + if (table->revision > 5 || >> + (table->revision == 5 && fadt->minor_revision >= 1)) { >> + return 0; >> + } else { >> + pr_info("FADT revision is %d.%d, no PSCI support, should be 5.1 >> or higher\n", >> + table->revision, fadt->minor_revision); >> + disable_acpi(); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } > > Given you return in the first path, you don't need the remaining code to > live in an else block. Agreed, I will update it, and move disable_acpi() outside this function and keep it in one place as Sudeep suggested. Thanks Hanjun