From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcos Paulo de souza <marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ACPI defined devices not showing up under /sys/bus/platform/devices
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:49:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <541B455C.4000601@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140918140106.GU10854@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Hi,
On 09/18/2014 04:01 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:04:11PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to help various users with Asus X450 and Asus X550 laptops
>> to get their touchpad to work:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110011
>>
>> We believe that this touchpad is connected over i2c, using the
>> i2c-designware-platform driver.
>>
>> If you look at the DSDT attached there you can clearly see
>> nodes defines which should lead to e.g. :
>>
>> /sys/bus/platform/devices/INT33C2:00
>>
>> Showing up (which should then be bound by i2c-designware-platform).
>>
>> But nothing is showing up, not a single ACPI defined device shows
>> up actually:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [root@asusx550 devices]# ll
>> insgesamt 0
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 22. Jul 14:56 alarmtimer -> ../../../devices/platform/alarmtimer
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 25. Jul 23:54 asus-nb-wmi -> ../../../devices/platform/asus-nb-wmi
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 25. Jul 23:54 coretemp.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/coretemp.0
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 22. Jul 14:56 efi-framebuffer.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/efi-framebuffer.0
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 22. Jul 14:56 Fixed MDIO bus.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/Fixed MDIO bus.0
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 22. Jul 14:56 i8042 -> ../../../devices/platform/i8042
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 25. Jul 23:54 iTCO_wdt -> ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.0/iTCO_wdt
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 25. Jul 23:54 microcode -> ../../../devices/platform/microcode
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 22. Jul 14:56 pcspkr -> ../../../devices/platform/pcspkr
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 25. Jul 23:54 regulatory.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/regulatory.0
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 25. Jul 23:54 rtsx_pci_ms.0 -> ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.2/0000:02:00.0/rtsx_pci_ms.0
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 25. Jul 23:54 rtsx_pci_sdmmc.0 -> ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.2/0000:02:00.0/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.0
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 22. Jul 14:56 serial8250 -> ../../../devices/platform/serial8250
>>
>>
>> Which is weird, since any recent machine usually has at least one or 2
>> show up.
>
> It depends whether the BIOS has enabled those or not.
>
> If
>
> # cat /sys/bus/acpi/devices/INT33C2:00/status
> # cat /sys/bus/acpi/devices/INT33C3:00/status
>
> returns 0xf, then the device should be there, otherwise it is not.
Interesting. Marcos, can you give this a try please ?
> The "status" refers directly shat _STA() ACPI method returns.
Ok, so assuming that Marcos' testing shows it is not enabled,
is there anything we can, could there be some ACPI call to
enable these devs ?
> Note that the device could also be in PCI mode, in case lspci should
> show it.
Right, it does not show in lspci.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-18 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-18 12:04 ACPI defined devices not showing up under /sys/bus/platform/devices Hans de Goede
2014-09-18 14:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-18 20:49 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2014-09-18 21:02 ` Marcos Paulo de souza
2014-09-19 8:47 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-19 11:48 ` Marcos Paulo de souza
2014-09-19 12:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-19 12:19 ` Marcos Paulo de souza
2014-09-19 12:26 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-20 8:48 ` Hans de Goede
2014-09-22 9:14 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-19 11:51 ` Marcos Paulo de souza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=541B455C.4000601@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcos.souza.org@gmail.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox