From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hanjun Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI / processor: Rename acpi_(un)map_lsapic() to acpi_(un)map_cpu() Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 07:49:49 +0800 Message-ID: <5452CE9D.6000403@linaro.org> References: <1414662780-2147-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1414662780-2147-3-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <2516177.7dftOY8x88@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2516177.7dftOY8x88@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jiang Liu , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , Tony Luck , "H. Peter Anvin" , Grant Likely , Sudeep Holla , Lv Zheng , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 2014=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8831=E6=97=A5 04:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, October 30, 2014 05:53:00 PM Hanjun Guo wrote: >> acpi_map_lsapic() will allocate a logical CPU number and map it to >> physical CPU id (such as APIC id) for the hot-added CPU, it will als= o >> do some mapping for NUMA node id and etc, acpi_unmap_lsapic() will >> do the reverse. >> >> We can see that the name of the function is a little bit confusing a= nd >> arch dependent so rename them as acpi_(un)map_map() to make arch > > That's acpi_(un)map_cpu() I guess? ah, yes, typos, it should be acpi_(un)map_cpu(), my fault. should I send another version? Thanks Hanjun