From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] Mailbox: Add support for Platform Communication Channel Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:07:03 +0000 Message-ID: <54625047.2000103@arm.com> References: <1415371964-4451-1-git-send-email-ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> <1415371964-4451-2-git-send-email-ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> <5461E548.2040204@arm.com> <20141111172955.GA3815@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:41726 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751089AbaKKSGr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:06:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141111172955.GA3815@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Sudeep Holla , Ashwin Chaugule , "jaswinder.singh@linaro.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "patches@linaro.org" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "lv.zheng@intel.com" Hi Mark, On 11/11/14 17:29, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:30:32AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> On 07/11/14 14:52, Ashwin Chaugule wrote: > >>> +config PCC >>> + bool "Platform Communication Channel Driver" >>> + depends on ACPI > >> I am bit confused here, though I prefer PCC to depend on ACPI, I have >> seen discussion in this thread about using PCC without ACPI, how will >> that work ? > > We can always remove the dependency when someone adds the code to talk > to non-ACPI PCC devices. > Agreed, Ashwin clarified that, I had not followed previous versions closely and was speaking only in the context of this patch. Regards, Sudeep