From: nick <xerofoify@gmail.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.19-rc1 errors when opening LID
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 12:31:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <549EECF9.40206@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201412270919.49540@pali>
Pali,
This seems to be a likely culprit. Would you mind building a kernel before that commit was merged in order to
test if it works.
Regards Nick
On 2014-12-27 03:19 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in attachment is output of ls -l /sys/bus/acpi/devices from both
> 3.13 and 3.19 kernels.
>
> Anyway Gabriele Mazzotta wrote me that new acpi devices could be
> created after commit faae404ebdc6bba (ACPICA: Add "Windows 2013"
> string to _OSI support).
>
> Maybe this another output could help you:
>
> $ cat /sys/bus/acpi/devices/INT33C5\:00/status
> 0
> $ cat /sys/bus/acpi/devices/INT33C5\:00/power_state
> (unknown)
>
> Device INT33C5 is in that dmesg log:
> acpi INT33C5:00: Cannot transition to non-D0 state from D3
>
> And status 0 in sysnode could indicate that acpi device is not
> present right?
>
> On Thursday 25 December 2014 17:59:36 nick wrote:
>> Pali,
>> This was probably to either add better power management or
>> enable some new features related to acpi. Can you send me the
>> files they created in kernel 3.19 r1 as I can probably trace
>> it back to the bad commit. Regards Nick
>>
>> On 2014-12-25 03:48 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>> I know how to use git... first I wanted to report errors
>>> because maybe it could be known problem or somebody else
>>> can come with quick patch even without bisetcing (like for
>>> other problems which I reported).
>>>
>>> Anyway those acpi devices which are mentioned in log do not
>>> exist in 3.13 kernel (I do not see them in /sys/devices)
>>>
>>> Any idea why 3.19 kernel create new acpi devices which 3.13
>>> kernel did not?
>>>
>>> On Thursday 25 December 2014 05:28:27 nick wrote:
>>>> Pali,
>>>> Do you known how to run git bisect as this is probably the
>>>> best way to continue. Otherwise, I can teach you how it's
>>>> not hard if your willing to learn :). Cheers Nick
>>>>
>>>> On 2014-12-24 01:51 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>
>>>>> With new 3.19-rc1 kernel every time when I open LID on my
>>>>> laptop, kernel prints these error lines to dmesg:
>>>>>
>>>>> [25566.368133] [drm:hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect.isra.6
>>>>> [i915]] *ERROR* Unclaimed register detected. Please use
>>>>> the i915.mmio_debug=1 to debug this problem.
>>>>> [25566.368134] [drm:intel_uncore_check_errors [i915]]
>>>>> *ERROR* Unclaimed register before interrupt
>>>>> [25566.368192]
>>>>> [drm:hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect.isra.6 [i915]] *ERROR*
>>>>> Unclaimed register detected. Please use the
>>>>> i915.mmio_debug=1 to debug this problem. [25566.368232]
>>>>> [drm:hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect.isra.6 [i915]] *ERROR*
>>>>> Unclaimed register detected. Please use the
>>>>> i915.mmio_debug=1 to debug this problem.<4>[25568.446011]
>>>>> i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has
>>>>> bogus alignment
>>>>> [25568.447018] pci_bus 0000:02: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447055] pci_bus 0000:03: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447135] pci_bus 0000:04: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447168] pci_bus 0000:05: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447195] pci_bus 0000:06: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447228] pci_bus 0000:0e: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447323] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000
>>>>> flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [25568.447557] i915
>>>>> 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has bogus
>>>>> alignment [25568.447735] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [???
>>>>> 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [25568.447847]
>>>>> i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has
>>>>> bogus alignment [25568.448399] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6:
>>>>> [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has bogus alignment
>>>>> [25568.448438] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000
>>>>> flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [25568.448566] acpi
>>>>> MSFT1111:00: Cannot transition to power state D3cold for
>>>>> parent in (unknown) [25568.448572] acpi INT33C2:00: Cannot
>>>>> transition to non-D0 state from D3 [25568.448577] acpi
>>>>> MSFT0002:00: Cannot transition to power state D3cold for
>>>>> parent in (unknown) [25568.448581] acpi ELAN1010:00:
>>>>> Cannot transition to power state D3cold for parent in
>>>>> (unknown) [25568.448587] acpi INT33C3:00: Cannot
>>>>> transition to non-D0 state from D3 [25568.448590] acpi
>>>>> INT33C0:00: Cannot transition to non-D0 state from D3
>>>>> [25568.448594] acpi INT33C1:00: Cannot transition to
>>>>> non-D0 state from D3 [25568.448598] acpi INT33C4:00:
>>>>> Cannot transition to non-D0 state from D3 [25568.448602]
>>>>> acpi INT33C5:00: Cannot transition to non-D0 state from
>>>>> D3 [25568.448623] acpi device:41: Cannot transition to
>>>>> power state D3cold for parent in (unknown) [25568.448627]
>>>>> acpi INT33C6:00: Cannot transition to non-D0 state from
>>>>> D3 [25568.448890] pci_bus 0000:01: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.448905] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000
>>>>> flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [25568.449064] i915
>>>>> 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has bogus
>>>>> alignment [25568.449472] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [???
>>>>> 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has bogus alignment
>>>>>
>>>>> With older kernel (3.13) I do not see these errors, so it
>>>>> is regression. Can you look at it? If it is needed, I can
>>>>> provide other logs, ACPI/DSTD dumps, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>>>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-27 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-24 18:51 3.19-rc1 errors when opening LID Pali Rohár
2014-12-25 4:28 ` nick
2014-12-25 8:48 ` Pali Rohár
2014-12-25 16:59 ` nick
2014-12-27 8:19 ` Pali Rohár
2014-12-27 17:31 ` nick [this message]
2014-12-27 20:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-12-27 20:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Joe Perches
2015-04-06 10:02 ` 4.0-rc6 " Pali Rohár
2014-12-26 15:12 ` 3.19-rc1 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-12-26 15:52 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=549EECF9.40206@gmail.com \
--to=xerofoify@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).