From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hanjun Guo Subject: Re: =?gbk?Q?=B4=F0=B8=B4=3A_=5BPATCH_v6_17/17=5D_Documen?= =?gbk?Q?tation=3A_ACPI_for_ARM64?= Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 19:21:53 +0800 Message-ID: <54ABC551.3080005@linaro.org> References: <1420368918-5086-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1420368918-5086-18-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: liyi 00215672 , Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , Grant Likely , Will Deacon Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Graeme Gregory , Sudeep Holla , Jon Masters , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Robert Richter , Randy Dunlap , "Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com" , Timur Tabi , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , Al Stone List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Yi, On 2015=C4=EA01=D4=C206=C8=D5 17:52, liyi 00215672 wrote: > In traditional telecom market, what confused us(Huawei) was our softw= are and > hardware coupling together oftentimes. So if we change some hardware = then we > MUST modify our software, which was not our customer=A1=AFs expectati= on. In x86 world, > we have UEFI and ACPI technologies, they are suitable to solve this p= roblem very > well, we just upgrade our hardware and don=A1=AFt need to upgrade the= ir software, > in the meantime ACPI provides many methods on power management. > > In ARM64 world, we are aiming the same thing. Following the SBBR,SBSA= specs > to implement our UEFI and ACPI code, we think the patch set and arm-a= cpi > documentation are fine , and consider it is going on the right direct= ion, so > > Reviewed-by: Yi Li Thanks a lot! Regards, Hanjun