From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Masters Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:24:43 -0500 Message-ID: <54AC0C4B.1000907@redhat.com> References: <1413553034-20956-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <54A28B22.7090305@linaro.org> <20150105131302.GB14967@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <1797489.PjmKzBFdQA@wuerfel> <20150106112000.GA8829@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150106112000.GA8829@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Catalin Marinas , Arnd Bergmann Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" , Mark Rutland , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , Will Deacon , Lv Zheng , Rob Herring , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Al Stone , Daniel Lezcano , Robert Moore , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Charles Garcia-Tobin , Robert Richter , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Liviu Dudau , Mark Brown , Bjorn Helgaas , graeme.gr List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 01/06/2015 06:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Now, what's preventing a vendor firmware from providing only ACPI > tables? Do we enforce it in some way (arm-acpi.txt, kernel warning etc.) > that both DT and ACPI are supported, or at least that dts files are > merged in the kernel first? I know of some (server) firmware that will only provide ACPI in the medium term, so this is coming. Jon.