From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Masters Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:58:44 -0500 Message-ID: <54B80DE4.5060902@redhat.com> References: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35056 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752164AbbAOTAV (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:00:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Hanjun Guo , Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , Grant Likely , Will Deacon Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Graeme Gregory , Sudeep Holla , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Robert Richter , Randy Dunlap , Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com, phoenix.liyi@huawei.com, Timur Tabi , suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, wangyijing@huawei.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org On 01/14/2015 10:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi, > > This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 > > updates from v6: > - Rebased on top of 3.19-rc4, add Mack Salter's patch to use > the early_ioremap after paging_init() for ACPI table mappings; > > - Two patches about converting apic_id to phys_id to make it arch > agnostic were already merged into RC4 by Rafael. > > - Split patch "Parse FADT table to get PSCI flags for PSCI init" > into two as Lorenzo's suggestion, also fix typo and lack of __init > for psci_0_2_set_functions() which is spotted by Lorenzo. > > - Add Tested-by from Yijing Wang. > > previous version is here: > v6: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/4/40 > > 1. Why we need ACPI on ARM64? > > - Grant already posted a blog about this, and stated clearly > why we need ACPI on ARM64: > > http://www.secretlab.ca/archives/151 > > > 2. What we need to do before the arm64 ACPI core patches > could be merged into the kernel? > > - Al Stone posted a TODO list and updates v2 for the > progress we made: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg390069.html > > - so from the progress we can see that we already finished > most of the items, and _OSI we got a plan to fix it, RFC > patch is on the way. > > > This patch set was tested on FVP by Fuwei, and booted ok as expected. > (No functional change since last version) For the entire series: Tested-by: Jon Masters