From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 04/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param
 for "acpi" and pass acpi=force to enable ACPI
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:21:54 -0600
Message-ID: <54CA7A42.5080800@codeaurora.org>
References: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>	<1421247905-3749-5-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>	<CAOZdJXU2bFR1T4ZnGavvnrUXAp5e=vNt9g6WKX46H8qs1wz-TQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAOZdJXXe+29rux1L3QYBX0yHLy3kdi+ZJrXVd=XfgYN=R6DtKA@mail.gmail.com>	<20150128181453.GG31752@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>	<54C92804.5090806@codeaurora.org>	<20150129151956.GF8951@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <CAKv+Gu_=si=L5+vvg+8hRgwmTahqdePw5bZxUMFSZ8obk-VXFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_=si=L5+vvg+8hRgwmTahqdePw5bZxUMFSZ8obk-VXFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, "phoenix.liyi@huawei.com" <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>, Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>, "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>, Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>, Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>, "wangyijing@huawei.com" <wangyijing@huawei.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>, "jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Jason
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On 01/29/2015 12:20 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> If we are going with this solution, we should also mandate that an
> ACPI enabled firmware should not supply a non-DT DTB

What is a non-DT DTB?  I thought the "DT" in "DTB" stood for device tree.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.