From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hanjun Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/21] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce PCI stub functions for ACPI Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:06:15 +0800 Message-ID: <54D1E107.9000307@linaro.org> References: <1422881149-8177-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20150203121546.GD3677@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <54D0CD58.2000609@linaro.org> <2157836.CgDKH4QWp1@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:35843 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751373AbbBDJG0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 04:06:26 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id eu11so1150588pac.2 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 01:06:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2157836.CgDKH4QWp1@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Catalin Marinas , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Will Deacon , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Sudeep Holla , "jcm@redhat.com" , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , Daniel Lezcano , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Robert Richter , Randy Dunlap , Charles Garcia-Tobin , "phoenix.liyi@huawei.com" , Timur Tabi , Ashwin Chaugule On 2015=E5=B9=B402=E6=9C=8803=E6=97=A5 22:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, February 03, 2015 09:30:00 PM Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2015=E5=B9=B402=E6=9C=8803=E6=97=A5 20:15, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 12:45:34PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c >>>> index ce5836c..c17e7ea 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c >>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ >>>> * >>>> */ >>>> >>>> +#include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> @@ -68,3 +69,27 @@ void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *b= us, struct device *parent) >>>> bus->domain_nr =3D domain; >>>> } >>>> #endif >>>> + >>>> +/* >>>> + * raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access= =2E >>>> + */ >>>> +int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, >>>> + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val) >>>> +{ >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, >>>> + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val) >>>> +{ >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> +} >>> >>> You said you'll make these return -ENOSYS, which I think makes more >>> sense. >> >> I'm sorry, I missed that, my bad, I will fix that in next version. > > Actually, -ENOSYS *specifically* means "not implemented system call". > It should not be used for anything other than that. -ENXIO is what > should be used instead. Thanks for the suggestion :) Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html