linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong" <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
	leif.lindholm@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, fu.wei@linaro.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org,
	vgandhi@codeaurora.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] acpi, apei: use EFI memmap to map GHES memory
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 09:43:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5571D1AE.4050605@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150605095701.GA20042@codeblueprint.co.uk>

Thanks Matt for the review. Yes, you are right on, I am following
this:
 > modify ghes_ioremap_* to query the EFI memmap (if
 > it's available at runtime) to lookup the correct mapping attributes.

Jonathan

On 6/5/2015 2:57 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> [ Cc'ing Boris and Tony. Folks original patch is here,
>    https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433185940-24770-4-git-send-email-zjzhang@codeaurora.org ]
>
> On Mon, 01 Jun, at 12:12:20PM, Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang wrote:
>> From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> With ACPI APEI firmware first handling, generic hardware error
>> record is updated by firmware in GHES memory region. When firmware
>> updated GHES memory region in DDR without going through cache,
>> Linux reads stale data from cache.
>>
>> GHES memory region should be mapped with cache attributes
>> according to EFI memory map when applicable. If firmware updates
>> DDR directly, EFI memory map has GHES memory region defined as
>> uncached; If firmware updates cache, EFI memory map has GHES
>> memory region defined as cached.
>>
>> When EFI is configued, map IRQ page using efi_remap() provided by
>> EFI subsystem.
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ static void __iomem *ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi(u64 pfn)
>>   	return (void __iomem *)vaddr;
>>   }
>>
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_EFI
>>   static void __iomem *ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq(u64 pfn)
>>   {
>>   	unsigned long vaddr;
>
> Sprinkling CONFIG_EFI like this is wrong. On x86 we run kernels built
> with CONFIG_EFI on machines with BIOS - you can't make the EFI vs.
> non-EFI decision at compile-time.
>
> So this patch looks like a potential regression to me since on x86
> ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq() would not be used anymore and instead we'd be
> using efi_remap() which will perform an ioremap_nocache() if it gets
> called after efi_free_boot_services().
>
> And based on the comments in the apei code, that's going to cause issues
> because ioremap() does not work in atomic context, not to mention the
> fact that we've gone from a cached mapping to an uncached one.
>
> Instead, I suggest you modify ghes_ioremap_* to query the EFI memmap (if
> it's available at runtime) to lookup the correct mapping attributes.
>
> But I've Cc'd some more people who have actually worked on this code,
> since I'm not one of them.
>

-- 
Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-05 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-01 19:12 [PATCH V2 0/3] map GHES memory region with EFI memory map Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang
2015-06-01 19:12 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] acpi, apei: use EFI memmap to map GHES memory Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang
2015-06-05  9:57   ` Matt Fleming
2015-06-05 10:25     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-05 17:05       ` Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong
2015-06-05 17:12         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-05 21:43           ` Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong
2015-06-05 16:43     ` Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong [this message]
2015-06-05 16:50       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-05 17:06         ` Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5571D1AE.4050605@codeaurora.org \
    --to=zjzhang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
    --cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
    --cc=vgandhi@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).