From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Move duplicate code to a separate new function
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 22:58:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BF8189.2040202@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4854608.nIfMTUvZQu@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 08/01/2015 08:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> After merging commit 712e960f0ee9 (ACPI / PM: Attach ACPI power
> domain only once) with commit 1dcc3d3362b0 (ACPI / bus: Move ACPI
> bus type registration) there is some duplicate code in
> acpi_device_is_first_physical_node() and acpi_companion_match()
> that can be moved to a separate routine and called from both
> places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>
> On top of linux-pm.git/linux-next.
>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -482,6 +482,26 @@ static void acpi_device_remove_notify_ha
> Device Matching
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
>
> +static struct acpi_device *acpi_primary_dev_companion(struct acpi_device *adev,
> + const struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct mutex *physical_node_lock = &adev->physical_node_lock;
> +
> + mutex_lock(physical_node_lock);
> + if (list_empty(&adev->physical_node_list)) {
> + adev = NULL;
> + } else {
> + const struct acpi_device_physical_node *node;
> +
> + node = list_first_entry(&adev->physical_node_list,
> + struct acpi_device_physical_node, node);
> + if (node->dev != dev)
> + adev = NULL;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(physical_node_lock);
> + return adev;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * acpi_device_is_first_physical_node - Is given dev first physical node
> * @adev: ACPI companion device
> @@ -496,19 +516,7 @@ static void acpi_device_remove_notify_ha
> bool acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev,
> const struct device *dev)
> {
> - bool ret = false;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> - if (!list_empty(&adev->physical_node_list)) {
> - const struct acpi_device_physical_node *node;
> -
> - node = list_first_entry(&adev->physical_node_list,
> - struct acpi_device_physical_node, node);
> - ret = node->dev == dev;
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return !!acpi_primary_dev_companion(adev, dev);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -535,7 +543,6 @@ bool acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(
> struct acpi_device *acpi_companion_match(const struct device *dev)
> {
> struct acpi_device *adev;
> - struct mutex *physical_node_lock;
>
> adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> if (!adev)
> @@ -544,21 +551,7 @@ struct acpi_device *acpi_companion_match
> if (list_empty(&adev->pnp.ids))
> return NULL;
>
> - physical_node_lock = &adev->physical_node_lock;
> - mutex_lock(physical_node_lock);
> - if (list_empty(&adev->physical_node_list)) {
> - adev = NULL;
> - } else {
> - const struct acpi_device_physical_node *node;
> -
> - node = list_first_entry(&adev->physical_node_list,
> - struct acpi_device_physical_node, node);
> - if (node->dev != dev)
> - adev = NULL;
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(physical_node_lock);
> -
> - return adev;
> + return acpi_primary_dev_companion(adev, dev);
> }
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Thanks
Hanjun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-01 0:39 [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Move duplicate code to a separate new function Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-03 9:48 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-08-03 14:58 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BF8189.2040202@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).