From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong" Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/5] map GHES memory region according to EFI memory map Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:58:52 -0700 Message-ID: <55C232BC.1010107@codeaurora.org> References: <1438292109-4170-1-git-send-email-zjzhang@codeaurora.org> <20150803112658.GE10501@arm.com> <20150803162354.GQ2725@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150804042552.GG31787@nazgul.tnic> <55C0DD30.9070800@codeaurora.org> <20150805092125.GB4332@codeblueprint.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150805092125.GB4332-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Matt Fleming Cc: Borislav Petkov , Will Deacon , Matt Fleming , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "tony.luck-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , "ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "fu.wei-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "al.stone-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org" , "lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "ying.huang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , Catalin Marinas , "leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "hanjun.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 8/5/2015 2:21 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Tue, 04 Aug, at 08:41:36AM, Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong wrote: >> >> On 8/3/2015 9:25 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 05:23:54PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: >>>> Rafael, Boris? >>> >>> The ghes.c change looks fine I guess. The whole patchset makes sense >>> now, with the arch bits extracted. So >>> >>> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov >> Thank you Boris/Matt/Will for the support. > > Jonathan, if you fixup the compiler error in PATCH 2 I'll take this > series through the EFI tree. Yes, absolutely. It has been in my mind, sorry I was tied up in the last few days. I wonder what I may missed, I certainly do x86 build test with versions of the patch set. I will try today and report back. -- Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project