linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
To: "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>,
	"marc.zyngier@arm.com" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"jason@lakedaemon.net" <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: "rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, "pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:36:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E5A9EE.3030704@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C1C2579D7BE026428F81F41198ADB1723786A47E@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com>



On 01.09.2015 14:07, Anaczkowski, Lukasz wrote:
> From: Tomasz Nowicki [mailto:tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 10:03 AM
>
>>> To fix this, each LAPIC/X2APIC entry from MADT table needs to be
>>> handled at the same time when processing it, thus adding
>>> acpi_subtable_proc structure which stores
>>> () ACPI table id
>>> () handler that processes table
>>> () counter how many items has been processed and passing it to
>>> acpi_table_parse_entries().
>
>> Why can't you leave the parsing code as is and create ApicId sorted list while parsing LAPIC/X2APIC? You could call acpi_register_lapic() after all... Do I miss something ?
>
> Just to make sure I understand correctly - you suggest to replace calls to acpi_register_lapic() with a code that builds an APIC ID list while parsing LAPIC/X2APIC, and after parsing is done,
> go thru the list and call acpi_register_lapic() on each APIC ID, correct?
>

Yes, does it work for you?

Tomasz

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-01 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507211017590.18576 () nanos>
2015-07-30 17:43 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle xapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-07-30 17:43   ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-02  9:57     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-02 12:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-03 18:26       ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-03 18:26         ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-26  7:04           ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-08-26 10:43             ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 11:42               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-08-26 12:43                 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 17:49                   ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-26 17:49                     ` [PATCH] x86, arm64, " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-27  9:37                       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-08 11:07                         ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07                           ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07                             ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi: rename acpi_table_parse_entries Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07                               ` [PATCH 2/4] x86, arm64, acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07                                 ` [PATCH 3/4] acpi: multi proc support Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:08                                   ` [PATCH 4/4] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 15:22                                     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-08 16:27                             ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Marc Zyngier
2015-09-08 22:45                               ` Al Stone
2015-09-09  7:01                               ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-09  9:30                               ` [PATCH 0/2] " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09  9:30                                 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09  9:30                                   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:56                                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 14:27                                       ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-09 15:43                                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 10:47                                   ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Marc Zyngier
2015-09-09 13:47                                     ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47                                       ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47                                         ` [PATCH v4 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47                                           ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 20:45                                         ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-18 22:38                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-28  8:30                       ` [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Ingo Molnar
2015-09-01  8:02                       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-01 12:07                         ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-01 13:36                           ` Tomasz Nowicki [this message]
2015-09-07 14:04                             ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-08 14:44                               ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-08-26 11:03           ` [PATCH] x86, " Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 12:56           ` Tomasz Nowicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55E5A9EE.3030704@linaro.org \
    --to=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).