linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:47:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F00E55.9080008@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441791018-14669-2-git-send-email-lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>

Hi Lucasz,

Nit: Please add a version number to the patches you send - this is at
least the 4th revision of this series, and it is harder to keep track of
what I'm reviewing. git send-email --subject-prefix "PATCH v4" is your
friend.

On 09/09/15 10:30, Lukasz Anaczkowski wrote:
> ACPI subtable parsing needs to be extended to allow two or more
> handlers to be run in the same ACPI table walk, thus adding
> acpi_subtable_proc structure which stores
> () ACPI table id
> () handler that processes table
> () counter how many items has been processed
> and passing it to acpi_parse_entries_array() and
> acpi_table_parse_entries_array().
> 
> This is needed to fix CPU enumeration when APIC/X2APIC entries
> are interleaved.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/tables.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  include/linux/acpi.h  | 13 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> index 2e19189..13e5089 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> @@ -214,20 +214,37 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * acpi_parse_entries_array - for each proc_num find a subtable with proc->id
> + *    and run proc->handler on it. Assumption is that there's only
> + *    single handler for particular entry id.
> + *
> + * @id: table id (for debugging purposes)
> + * @table_size: single entry size
> + * @table_header: where does the table start?
> + * @proc: array of acpi_subtable_proc struct containing entry id
> + *        and associated handler with it
> + * @proc_num: how big proc is?
> + * @max_entries: how many entries can we process?
> + *
> + * On success returns sum of all matching entries for all proc handlers.
> + * Oterwise, -ENODEV or -EINVAL is returned.

s/Oterwise/Otherwise/

> + */
>  int __init
> -acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> -		acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> +acpi_parse_entries_array(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>  		struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
> -		int entry_id, unsigned int max_entries)
> +		struct acpi_subtable_proc *proc, int proc_num,
> +		unsigned int max_entries)

It seems that there is no user of this function outside of this file, so
it can be made static.

>  {
>  	struct acpi_subtable_header *entry;
> -	int count = 0;
>  	unsigned long table_end;
> +	int count = 0;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	if (acpi_disabled)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	if (!id || !handler)
> +	if (!id)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!table_size)
> @@ -247,20 +264,27 @@ acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>  
>  	while (((unsigned long)entry) + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) <
>  	       table_end) {
> -		if (entry->type == entry_id
> -		    && (!max_entries || count < max_entries)) {
> -			if (handler(entry, table_end))
> +		if (max_entries && count >= max_entries)
> +			break;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < proc_num; i++) {
> +			if (entry->type != proc[i].id)
> +				continue;
> +			if (!proc->handler || proc[i].handler(entry, table_end))
>  				return -EINVAL;
>  
> -			count++;
> +			proc->count++;
> +			break;
>  		}
> +		if (i != proc_num)
> +			count++;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * If entry->length is 0, break from this loop to avoid
>  		 * infinite loop.
>  		 */
>  		if (entry->length == 0) {
> -			pr_err("[%4.4s:0x%02x] Invalid zero length\n", id, entry_id);
> +			pr_err("[%4.4s:0x%02x] Invalid zero length\n", id, proc->id);
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -270,17 +294,31 @@ acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>  
>  	if (max_entries && count > max_entries) {
>  		pr_warn("[%4.4s:0x%02x] ignored %i entries of %i found\n",
> -			id, entry_id, count - max_entries, count);
> +			id, proc->id, count - max_entries, count);
>  	}
>  
>  	return count;
>  }
>  
> +int __init acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> +			       acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> +			       struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
> +			       int entry_id, unsigned int max_entries)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_subtable_proc proc = {
> +		.id		= entry_id,
> +		.handler	= handler,
> +		.count		= 0,

count is implicitly initialized to zero when you have a partial initializer.

> +	};
> +
> +	return acpi_parse_entries_array(id, table_size, table_header,
> +			&proc, 1, max_entries);
> +}
> +
>  int __init
> -acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
> +acpi_table_parse_entries_array(char *id,
>  			 unsigned long table_size,
> -			 int entry_id,
> -			 acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> +			 struct acpi_subtable_proc *proc, int proc_num,
>  			 unsigned int max_entries)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_table_header *table_header = NULL;
> @@ -291,7 +329,7 @@ acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
>  	if (acpi_disabled)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	if (!id || !handler)
> +	if (!id)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!strncmp(id, ACPI_SIG_MADT, 4))
> @@ -303,14 +341,31 @@ acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> -	count = acpi_parse_entries(id, table_size, handler, table_header,
> -			entry_id, max_entries);
> +	count = acpi_parse_entries_array(id, table_size, table_header,
> +			proc, proc_num, max_entries);
>  
>  	early_acpi_os_unmap_memory((char *)table_header, tbl_size);
>  	return count;
>  }
>  
>  int __init
> +acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
> +			unsigned long table_size,
> +			int entry_id,
> +			acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> +			unsigned int max_entries)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_subtable_proc proc = {
> +		.id		= entry_id,
> +		.handler	= handler,
> +		.count		= 0,

Same here.

> +	};
> +
> +	return acpi_table_parse_entries_array(id, table_size, &proc, 1,
> +						max_entries);
> +}
> +
> +int __init
>  acpi_table_parse_madt(enum acpi_madt_type id,
>  		      acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler, unsigned int max_entries)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index d2445fa..7a25ef9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -135,6 +135,12 @@ static inline void acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size)
>  		(!entry) || (unsigned long)entry + sizeof(*entry) > end ||  \
>  		((struct acpi_subtable_header *)entry)->length < sizeof(*entry))
>  
> +struct acpi_subtable_proc {
> +	int id;
> +	acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler;
> +	int count;
> +};
> +
>  char * __acpi_map_table (unsigned long phys_addr, unsigned long size);
>  void __acpi_unmap_table(char *map, unsigned long size);
>  int early_acpi_boot_init(void);
> @@ -149,10 +155,17 @@ int __init acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>  			      acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>  			      struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
>  			      int entry_id, unsigned int max_entries);
> +int __init acpi_parse_entries_array(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> +			      struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
> +			      struct acpi_subtable_proc *proc, int proc_num,
> +			      unsigned int max_entries);

and you can drop this one if you make it static in tables.c

>  int __init acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>  				    int entry_id,
>  				    acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>  				    unsigned int max_entries);
> +int __init acpi_table_parse_entries_array(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> +				    struct acpi_subtable_proc *proc, int proc_num,
> +				    unsigned int max_entries);
>  int acpi_table_parse_madt(enum acpi_madt_type id,
>  			  acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>  			  unsigned int max_entries);
> 

Other than that, I gave it a quick run on arm64, and it did boot without
any observable issue. If you respin it to address the above minor
comments, you can add my:

Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-09 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507211017590.18576 () nanos>
2015-07-30 17:43 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle xapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-07-30 17:43   ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-02  9:57     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-02 12:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-03 18:26       ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-03 18:26         ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-26  7:04           ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-08-26 10:43             ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 11:42               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-08-26 12:43                 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 17:49                   ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-26 17:49                     ` [PATCH] x86, arm64, " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-27  9:37                       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-08 11:07                         ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07                           ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07                             ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi: rename acpi_table_parse_entries Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07                               ` [PATCH 2/4] x86, arm64, acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07                                 ` [PATCH 3/4] acpi: multi proc support Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:08                                   ` [PATCH 4/4] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 15:22                                     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-08 16:27                             ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Marc Zyngier
2015-09-08 22:45                               ` Al Stone
2015-09-09  7:01                               ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-09  9:30                               ` [PATCH 0/2] " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09  9:30                                 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09  9:30                                   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:56                                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 14:27                                       ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-09 15:43                                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 10:47                                   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-09-09 13:47                                     ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47                                       ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47                                         ` [PATCH v4 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47                                           ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 20:45                                         ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-18 22:38                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-28  8:30                       ` [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Ingo Molnar
2015-09-01  8:02                       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-01 12:07                         ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-01 13:36                           ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-07 14:04                             ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-08 14:44                               ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-08-26 11:03           ` [PATCH] x86, " Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 12:56           ` Tomasz Nowicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55F00E55.9080008@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).