From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:47:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F00E55.9080008@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441791018-14669-2-git-send-email-lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>
Hi Lucasz,
Nit: Please add a version number to the patches you send - this is at
least the 4th revision of this series, and it is harder to keep track of
what I'm reviewing. git send-email --subject-prefix "PATCH v4" is your
friend.
On 09/09/15 10:30, Lukasz Anaczkowski wrote:
> ACPI subtable parsing needs to be extended to allow two or more
> handlers to be run in the same ACPI table walk, thus adding
> acpi_subtable_proc structure which stores
> () ACPI table id
> () handler that processes table
> () counter how many items has been processed
> and passing it to acpi_parse_entries_array() and
> acpi_table_parse_entries_array().
>
> This is needed to fix CPU enumeration when APIC/X2APIC entries
> are interleaved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/tables.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 13 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> index 2e19189..13e5089 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> @@ -214,20 +214,37 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * acpi_parse_entries_array - for each proc_num find a subtable with proc->id
> + * and run proc->handler on it. Assumption is that there's only
> + * single handler for particular entry id.
> + *
> + * @id: table id (for debugging purposes)
> + * @table_size: single entry size
> + * @table_header: where does the table start?
> + * @proc: array of acpi_subtable_proc struct containing entry id
> + * and associated handler with it
> + * @proc_num: how big proc is?
> + * @max_entries: how many entries can we process?
> + *
> + * On success returns sum of all matching entries for all proc handlers.
> + * Oterwise, -ENODEV or -EINVAL is returned.
s/Oterwise/Otherwise/
> + */
> int __init
> -acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> - acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> +acpi_parse_entries_array(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
> - int entry_id, unsigned int max_entries)
> + struct acpi_subtable_proc *proc, int proc_num,
> + unsigned int max_entries)
It seems that there is no user of this function outside of this file, so
it can be made static.
> {
> struct acpi_subtable_header *entry;
> - int count = 0;
> unsigned long table_end;
> + int count = 0;
> + int i;
>
> if (acpi_disabled)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (!id || !handler)
> + if (!id)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!table_size)
> @@ -247,20 +264,27 @@ acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>
> while (((unsigned long)entry) + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) <
> table_end) {
> - if (entry->type == entry_id
> - && (!max_entries || count < max_entries)) {
> - if (handler(entry, table_end))
> + if (max_entries && count >= max_entries)
> + break;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < proc_num; i++) {
> + if (entry->type != proc[i].id)
> + continue;
> + if (!proc->handler || proc[i].handler(entry, table_end))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - count++;
> + proc->count++;
> + break;
> }
> + if (i != proc_num)
> + count++;
>
> /*
> * If entry->length is 0, break from this loop to avoid
> * infinite loop.
> */
> if (entry->length == 0) {
> - pr_err("[%4.4s:0x%02x] Invalid zero length\n", id, entry_id);
> + pr_err("[%4.4s:0x%02x] Invalid zero length\n", id, proc->id);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -270,17 +294,31 @@ acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>
> if (max_entries && count > max_entries) {
> pr_warn("[%4.4s:0x%02x] ignored %i entries of %i found\n",
> - id, entry_id, count - max_entries, count);
> + id, proc->id, count - max_entries, count);
> }
>
> return count;
> }
>
> +int __init acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> + acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> + struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
> + int entry_id, unsigned int max_entries)
> +{
> + struct acpi_subtable_proc proc = {
> + .id = entry_id,
> + .handler = handler,
> + .count = 0,
count is implicitly initialized to zero when you have a partial initializer.
> + };
> +
> + return acpi_parse_entries_array(id, table_size, table_header,
> + &proc, 1, max_entries);
> +}
> +
> int __init
> -acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
> +acpi_table_parse_entries_array(char *id,
> unsigned long table_size,
> - int entry_id,
> - acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> + struct acpi_subtable_proc *proc, int proc_num,
> unsigned int max_entries)
> {
> struct acpi_table_header *table_header = NULL;
> @@ -291,7 +329,7 @@ acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
> if (acpi_disabled)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (!id || !handler)
> + if (!id)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!strncmp(id, ACPI_SIG_MADT, 4))
> @@ -303,14 +341,31 @@ acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - count = acpi_parse_entries(id, table_size, handler, table_header,
> - entry_id, max_entries);
> + count = acpi_parse_entries_array(id, table_size, table_header,
> + proc, proc_num, max_entries);
>
> early_acpi_os_unmap_memory((char *)table_header, tbl_size);
> return count;
> }
>
> int __init
> +acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
> + unsigned long table_size,
> + int entry_id,
> + acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> + unsigned int max_entries)
> +{
> + struct acpi_subtable_proc proc = {
> + .id = entry_id,
> + .handler = handler,
> + .count = 0,
Same here.
> + };
> +
> + return acpi_table_parse_entries_array(id, table_size, &proc, 1,
> + max_entries);
> +}
> +
> +int __init
> acpi_table_parse_madt(enum acpi_madt_type id,
> acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler, unsigned int max_entries)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index d2445fa..7a25ef9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -135,6 +135,12 @@ static inline void acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size)
> (!entry) || (unsigned long)entry + sizeof(*entry) > end || \
> ((struct acpi_subtable_header *)entry)->length < sizeof(*entry))
>
> +struct acpi_subtable_proc {
> + int id;
> + acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler;
> + int count;
> +};
> +
> char * __acpi_map_table (unsigned long phys_addr, unsigned long size);
> void __acpi_unmap_table(char *map, unsigned long size);
> int early_acpi_boot_init(void);
> @@ -149,10 +155,17 @@ int __init acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
> int entry_id, unsigned int max_entries);
> +int __init acpi_parse_entries_array(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> + struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
> + struct acpi_subtable_proc *proc, int proc_num,
> + unsigned int max_entries);
and you can drop this one if you make it static in tables.c
> int __init acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> int entry_id,
> acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> unsigned int max_entries);
> +int __init acpi_table_parse_entries_array(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> + struct acpi_subtable_proc *proc, int proc_num,
> + unsigned int max_entries);
> int acpi_table_parse_madt(enum acpi_madt_type id,
> acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
> unsigned int max_entries);
>
Other than that, I gave it a quick run on arm64, and it did boot without
any observable issue. If you respin it to address the above minor
comments, you can add my:
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-09 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507211017590.18576 () nanos>
2015-07-30 17:43 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle xapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-07-30 17:43 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-02 9:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-02 12:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-03 18:26 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-03 18:26 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-26 7:04 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-08-26 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 11:42 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-08-26 12:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 17:49 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-26 17:49 ` [PATCH] x86, arm64, " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-27 9:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-08 11:07 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi: rename acpi_table_parse_entries Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86, arm64, acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] acpi: multi proc support Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 15:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-08 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Marc Zyngier
2015-09-08 22:45 ` Al Stone
2015-09-09 7:01 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-09 9:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 14:27 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-09 15:43 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 20:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-18 22:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-28 8:30 ` [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Ingo Molnar
2015-09-01 8:02 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-01 12:07 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-01 13:36 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-07 14:04 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-08 14:44 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-08-26 11:03 ` [PATCH] x86, " Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 12:56 ` Tomasz Nowicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F00E55.9080008@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).