From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"sboyd@codeaurora.org" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken big-endian 64bit platforms using 'global_lock'
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:57:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56027798.7000700@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3821285.7cLYDZsCsX@wuerfel>
On 23/09/15 10:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 September 2015 10:15:42 Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On 15/09/15 09:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> global_lock is defined as an unsigned long and accessing only its lower
>>> 32 bits from sysfs is incorrect, as we need to consider other 32 bits
>>> for big endian 64 bit systems.
>>>
>>> Fix that by making global_lock an u32 instead.
>>>
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.1+
>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Its marked just for # v4.1+, because arm64 has the first 64 big-endian
>>> platform with ACPI. And ACPI support for that is mainlined recently
>>> only (Arnd Bergmann).
>>>
>>
>> Just to clarify, we don't support big-endian with ACPI on ARM64.
>> We mandate use of EFI for ACPI on ARM64 and EFI spec mandates only
>> little endian.
>>
>
> EFI doesn't care what endianess the kernel has, as long as the
> data structures are interpreted in the same way that the firmware
> defines them, and I thought that at least UEFI on ARM64 with big-endian
> is working in principle (if not, that is a bug that should be fixed).
>
> If ACPI is broken with big-endian kernels, we should probably add a
> Kconfig statement to forbid it, like this:
>
The diff looks sensible thing to have to avoid enabling ACPI with BE
though I am not sure if this can be regarded as broken as it could be
case of just not supported(my guess as I am not completely aware of the
history).
Also I am not against the $subject patch as such, just added
clarification so that it shouldn't be assumed that BE + ACPI works on
ARM64.
Regards,
Sudeep
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index 5d1015c26ff4..06cacc13e3d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ menuconfig ACPI
> bool "ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support"
> depends on !IA64_HP_SIM
> depends on IA64 || X86 || (ARM64 && EXPERT)
> + depends on !ARM64 || !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN || BROKEN
> depends on PCI
> select PNP
> default y
>
>
> Arnd
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-23 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-15 8:34 [PATCH V3 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken big-endian 64bit platforms using 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <9b705747a138c96c26faee5218f7b47403195b28.1442305897.git.viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-15 8:34 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] debugfs: don't assume sizeof(bool) to be 4 bytes Viresh Kumar
2015-09-15 9:13 ` Charles Keepax
[not found] ` <27d37898b4be6b9b9f31b90135f8206ca079a868.1442305897.git.viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-15 10:37 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1442313464.1914.21.camel-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-15 11:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-15 13:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-15 14:04 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <20150915094509.46cca84d-f9ZlEuEWxVcJvu8Pb33WZ0EMvNT87kid@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-15 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-09-15 17:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-16 7:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-09-16 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-15 14:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-15 14:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-15 14:29 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-16 1:57 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken big-endian 64bit platforms using 'global_lock' Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-16 2:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-16 1:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-23 7:52 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-09-24 23:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-23 9:15 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-23 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-23 9:57 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-09-23 10:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-25 0:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-25 0:03 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56027798.7000700@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).