linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk>,
	Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:40:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561B1DB9.6010909@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510112255330.6097@nanos>

On 10/12/2015 05:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> [This patch series used to be called "Making the generic ACPI GSI
>> layer irqdomain aware", but as I've radically changed my approach to
>> this problem, I've decided to reset the counters...]
>>
>> The irqdomain code is not entierely ACPI friendly, as it has some
>> built-in knowledge of the device-tree. Nothing too harmful, but enough
>> to scare the ARM ACPI developpers which end up with their own version
>> of the square wheel. And some of the ramifications actually run deeper
>> than initially expected.
>>
>> This series adapts the irqdomain code to use 'struct fwnode_handle'
>> instead of 'struct device_node' as the identifier for a domain
>> (compatibility interfaces are of course added). It also introduces a
>> generic IRQ specifier that firmware interfaces (DT or ACPI) can
>> directly use to configure interrupts, and allow the ACPI GSI code to
>> be plugged into this.
>>
>> As examples, we convert the ARM GIC ACPI support to use irqdomains as
>> originally intended, and rework the MSI code to also move away from
>> using device nodes when using irqdomains.
>>
>> Overall, this gives us a way to use irqdomains on both DT and ACPI
>> enabled platforms, having very little changes made to the actual
>> drivers (other than the probing infrastructure). Because we keep the
>> flow of information between the various layers identical between ACPI
>> and DT, we immediately benefit from the existing infrastructure.
>>
>> This has been test-booted on Juno, is based on 4.3-rc4, and available at:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git irq/irq-domain-fwnode-v1
>>
>> Marc Zyngier (16):
>>    irqdomain: Use an accessor for the of_node field
>>    irqdomain: Convert irqdomain->of_node to fwnode
>>    irqdomain: Allow irq domain lookup by fwnode
>>    irqdomain: Introduce a firmware-specific IRQ specifier structure
>>    irqchip: Convert all alloc/xlate users from of_node to fwnode
>>    irqdomain: Introduce irq_create_fwspec_mapping
>>    irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_{linear,tree}
>>    irqdomain: Add a fwnode_handle allocator
>>    acpi/gsi: Always perform an irq domain lookup
>>    acpi/gsi: Add acpi_set_irq_model to initialize the GSI layer
>>    irqchip/gic: Get rid of gic_init_bases()
>>    irqchip/gic: Switch ACPI support to stacked domains
>>    irqchip/gic: Kill the xlate method
>>    acpi/gsi: Cleanup acpi_register_gsi
>>    irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_hierarchy
>>    irqdomain/msi: Use fwnode instead of of_node
>
> I really like this one way better than the previous attempts and I
> couldn't find any real issue when going through them with a fine comb.

Fully agree, this version removes the dependency on DT for ACPI.

>
> I'd like to get that into 4.4, so I have to ask for the opinion of
> ACPI folks. Having an ack on those patches would be nice.

I'm reviewing this patch set, and will have a test today.

Thanks
Hanjun

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-12  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-06 17:36 [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 01/16] irqdomain: Use an accessor for the of_node field Marc Zyngier
2015-10-09 14:24   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-09 14:31     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12  6:04   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-12  9:30     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 02/16] irqdomain: Convert irqdomain->of_node to fwnode Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 03/16] irqdomain: Allow irq domain lookup by fwnode Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 18:31   ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-10-13  7:35     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 04/16] irqdomain: Introduce a firmware-specific IRQ specifier structure Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 05/16] irqchip: Convert all alloc/xlate users from of_node to fwnode Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12  6:44   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 06/16] irqdomain: Introduce irq_create_fwspec_mapping Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 07/16] irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_{linear,tree} Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 08/16] irqdomain: Add a fwnode_handle allocator Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 20:32   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 09/16] acpi/gsi: Always perform an irq domain lookup Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 20:34   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 10/16] acpi/gsi: Add acpi_set_irq_model to initialize the GSI layer Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 20:36   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 11/16] irqchip/gic: Get rid of gic_init_bases() Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 12/16] irqchip/gic: Switch ACPI support to stacked domains Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 13/16] irqchip/gic: Kill the xlate method Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 14/16] acpi/gsi: Cleanup acpi_register_gsi Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 20:37   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 15/16] irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_hierarchy Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 16/16] irqdomain/msi: Use fwnode instead of of_node Marc Zyngier
2015-10-11 21:01 ` [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-12  2:40   ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-10-12  7:09     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-12 10:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 20:38   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-13  8:24     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=561B1DB9.6010909@linaro.org \
    --to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=graeme@xora.org.uk \
    --cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).