From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk>,
Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:09:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561B5CBE.50701@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561B1DB9.6010909@linaro.org>
On 10/12/2015 10:40 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 05:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> [This patch series used to be called "Making the generic ACPI GSI
>>> layer irqdomain aware", but as I've radically changed my approach to
>>> this problem, I've decided to reset the counters...]
>>>
>>> The irqdomain code is not entierely ACPI friendly, as it has some
>>> built-in knowledge of the device-tree. Nothing too harmful, but enough
>>> to scare the ARM ACPI developpers which end up with their own version
>>> of the square wheel. And some of the ramifications actually run deeper
>>> than initially expected.
>>>
>>> This series adapts the irqdomain code to use 'struct fwnode_handle'
>>> instead of 'struct device_node' as the identifier for a domain
>>> (compatibility interfaces are of course added). It also introduces a
>>> generic IRQ specifier that firmware interfaces (DT or ACPI) can
>>> directly use to configure interrupts, and allow the ACPI GSI code to
>>> be plugged into this.
>>>
>>> As examples, we convert the ARM GIC ACPI support to use irqdomains as
>>> originally intended, and rework the MSI code to also move away from
>>> using device nodes when using irqdomains.
>>>
>>> Overall, this gives us a way to use irqdomains on both DT and ACPI
>>> enabled platforms, having very little changes made to the actual
>>> drivers (other than the probing infrastructure). Because we keep the
>>> flow of information between the various layers identical between ACPI
>>> and DT, we immediately benefit from the existing infrastructure.
>>>
>>> This has been test-booted on Juno, is based on 4.3-rc4, and available
>>> at:
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git
>>> irq/irq-domain-fwnode-v1
I pulled, and I found that there is v2 :)
>>>
>>> Marc Zyngier (16):
>>> irqdomain: Use an accessor for the of_node field
>>> irqdomain: Convert irqdomain->of_node to fwnode
>>> irqdomain: Allow irq domain lookup by fwnode
>>> irqdomain: Introduce a firmware-specific IRQ specifier structure
>>> irqchip: Convert all alloc/xlate users from of_node to fwnode
>>> irqdomain: Introduce irq_create_fwspec_mapping
>>> irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_{linear,tree}
>>> irqdomain: Add a fwnode_handle allocator
>>> acpi/gsi: Always perform an irq domain lookup
>>> acpi/gsi: Add acpi_set_irq_model to initialize the GSI layer
>>> irqchip/gic: Get rid of gic_init_bases()
>>> irqchip/gic: Switch ACPI support to stacked domains
>>> irqchip/gic: Kill the xlate method
>>> acpi/gsi: Cleanup acpi_register_gsi
>>> irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_hierarchy
>>> irqdomain/msi: Use fwnode instead of of_node
>>
>> I really like this one way better than the previous attempts and I
>> couldn't find any real issue when going through them with a fine comb.
>
> Fully agree, this version removes the dependency on DT for ACPI.
>
>>
>> I'd like to get that into 4.4, so I have to ask for the opinion of
>> ACPI folks. Having an ack on those patches would be nice.
>
> I'm reviewing this patch set, and will have a test today.
I'm pretty fine with this patch set (except some comments for patch 1),
I will wait for your v2 to be sent out, then add reviews and acks.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-06 17:36 [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 01/16] irqdomain: Use an accessor for the of_node field Marc Zyngier
2015-10-09 14:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-09 14:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 6:04 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-12 9:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 02/16] irqdomain: Convert irqdomain->of_node to fwnode Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 03/16] irqdomain: Allow irq domain lookup by fwnode Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 18:31 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-10-13 7:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 04/16] irqdomain: Introduce a firmware-specific IRQ specifier structure Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 05/16] irqchip: Convert all alloc/xlate users from of_node to fwnode Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 6:44 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 06/16] irqdomain: Introduce irq_create_fwspec_mapping Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 07/16] irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_{linear,tree} Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 08/16] irqdomain: Add a fwnode_handle allocator Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 09/16] acpi/gsi: Always perform an irq domain lookup Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 10/16] acpi/gsi: Add acpi_set_irq_model to initialize the GSI layer Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 11/16] irqchip/gic: Get rid of gic_init_bases() Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 12/16] irqchip/gic: Switch ACPI support to stacked domains Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 13/16] irqchip/gic: Kill the xlate method Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 14/16] acpi/gsi: Cleanup acpi_register_gsi Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 20:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 15/16] irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_hierarchy Marc Zyngier
2015-10-06 17:36 ` [PATCH 16/16] irqdomain/msi: Use fwnode instead of of_node Marc Zyngier
2015-10-11 21:01 ` [PATCH 00/16] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-12 2:40 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-12 7:09 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-10-12 10:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-13 8:24 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561B5CBE.50701@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=graeme@xora.org.uk \
--cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).