From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk>,
Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:49:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561D0BFB.4040000@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444737105-31573-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On 10/13/2015 07:51 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> [This patch series used to be called "Making the generic ACPI GSI
> layer irqdomain aware", but as I've radically changed my approach to
> this problem, I've decided to reset the counters...]
>
> The irqdomain code is not entierely ACPI friendly, as it has some
> built-in knowledge of the device-tree. Nothing too harmful, but enough
> to scare the ARM ACPI developpers which end up with their own version
> of the square wheel. And some of the ramifications actually run deeper
> than initially expected.
>
> This series adapts the irqdomain code to use 'struct fwnode_handle'
> instead of 'struct device_node' as the identifier for a domain
> (compatibility interfaces are of course added). It also introduces a
> generic IRQ specifier that firmware interfaces (DT or ACPI) can
> directly use to configure interrupts, and allow the ACPI GSI code to
> be plugged into this.
>
> As examples, we convert the ARM GIC ACPI support to use irqdomains as
> originally intended, and rework the MSI code to also move away from
> using device nodes when using irqdomains.
>
> Overall, this gives us a way to use irqdomains on both DT and ACPI
> enabled platforms, having very little changes made to the actual
> drivers (other than the probing infrastructure). Because we keep the
> flow of information between the various layers identical between ACPI
> and DT, we immediately benefit from the existing infrastructure.
>
> This has been test-booted on Juno, is based on 4.3-rc5 + tip/irq/core
> (in order to avoid potential conflicts), and available at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git irq/irq-domain-fwnode-v2
>
> * From v1:
> - Dropped irq_domain_get_of_node() from the first patch (merged into
> 4.3-rc5)
> - Fixed a few missing accessors in the first patch
> - Added EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for irq_find_matching_fwnode
> - Added some documentation update
> - Added Acks from Rafael
> - Rebased on top of 4.3-rc5 + tip/irq/core
>
> Marc Zyngier (17):
> irqdomain: Use irq_domain_get_of_node() instead of direct field access
> irqdomain: Convert irqdomain->of_node to fwnode
> irqdomain: Allow irq domain lookup by fwnode
> irqdomain: Introduce a firmware-specific IRQ specifier structure
> irqchip: Convert all alloc/xlate users from of_node to fwnode
> irqdomain: Introduce irq_create_fwspec_mapping
> irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_{linear,tree}
> irqdomain: Add a fwnode_handle allocator
> acpi/gsi: Always perform an irq domain lookup
> acpi/gsi: Add acpi_set_irq_model to initialize the GSI layer
> irqchip/gic: Get rid of gic_init_bases()
> irqchip/gic: Switch ACPI support to stacked domains
> irqchip/gic: Kill the xlate method
> acpi/gsi: Cleanup acpi_register_gsi
> irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_hierarchy
> irqdomain/msi: Use fwnode instead of of_node
> irqdomain: Documentation updates
For this patch series,
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
For patch 1 to patch14,
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Thanks a lot!
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-13 11:51 [PATCH v2 00/17] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] irqdomain: Use irq_domain_get_of_node() instead of direct field access Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] irqdomain: Convert irqdomain->of_node to fwnode Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] irqdomain: Allow irq domain lookup by fwnode Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] irqdomain: Introduce a firmware-specific IRQ specifier structure Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] irqchip: Convert all alloc/xlate users from of_node to fwnode Marc Zyngier
2015-10-14 15:26 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-10-14 15:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-14 15:37 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] irqdomain: Introduce irq_create_fwspec_mapping Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_{linear, tree} Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] irqdomain: Add a fwnode_handle allocator Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] acpi/gsi: Always perform an irq domain lookup Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] acpi/gsi: Add acpi_set_irq_model to initialize the GSI layer Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] irqchip/gic: Get rid of gic_init_bases() Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] irqchip/gic: Switch ACPI support to stacked domains Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] irqchip/gic: Kill the xlate method Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] acpi/gsi: Cleanup acpi_register_gsi Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_hierarchy Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] irqdomain/msi: Use fwnode instead of of_node Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] irqdomain: Documentation updates Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 13:49 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-10-13 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] Divorcing irqdomain and device_node Hanjun Guo
2015-10-13 15:38 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-13 16:39 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561D0BFB.4040000@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=graeme@xora.org.uk \
--cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).