From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suravee Suthikulpanit Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 7/8] PCI: OF: Move of_pci_dma_configure() to pci_dma_configure() Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:12:20 -0500 Message-ID: <56311004.6090809@amd.com> References: <1445442731-28819-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <1445442731-28819-8-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <562B36EC.3040406@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bn1on0066.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.110.66]:44256 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751673AbbJ1SM1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:12:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <562B36EC.3040406@huawei.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Hanjun Guo , bhelgaas@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com Cc: thomas.lendacky@amd.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Murali Karicheri , hanjun.guo@linaro.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Hanjun, On 10/24/15 02:44, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi Suravee, > > Some minor comments below: > > On 2015/10/21 23:52, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > [...] >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c >> index eea8b42..09264f8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c >> @@ -6,12 +6,14 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> -#include >> +#include > > Seems it's needed for GICv2m patch but not this one? This one is needed since we are making use of the new of_dma_configure instead of the of_pci_dma_configure. > >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> +#include > > I think acpi.h should be introduced by the next patch. You are right. I'll update this one. > >> +#include > > And property.h is also not needed for this patch set. You are right. I'll remove this Thanks, Suravee