From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hanjun Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 00/11] MMCONFIG refactoring and ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:50:58 +0800 Message-ID: <5632F732.3030805@huawei.com> References: <1445963922-22711-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <5632ED1C.7050500@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:47674 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751017AbbJ3Evp (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:51:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5632ED1C.7050500@redhat.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Masters , Tomasz Nowicki , bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com Cc: jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, Narinder.Dhillon@caviumnetworks.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org Hi Jon, On 2015/10/30 12:07, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > Thanks for posting this series. > > On 10/27/2015 12:38 PM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > >> From the functionality point of view this series might be split into two logic parts: >> 1. Making MMCONFIG code arch-agnostic which allows all architectures to collect >> PCI config regions and used when necessary. >> 2. Using generic MMCONFIG code and introducing ACPI based PCI hostbridge >> initialization for ARM64 > Can I confirm that the intention here is that this replaces Hanjun's > previous patch series? Here's the previous one we were tracking: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1432644564-24746-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org Yes, that's the new version according to the discussion from my version. > > Assuming that is the case, then we will ping a number of folks to > conduct testing and provide acks (this has already been discussed in a > number of conversations with semiconductors over the past few days). Much appreciated. Thanks Hanjun