From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Prakash, Prashanth" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:03:33 -0700 Message-ID: <564E4735.5080609@codeaurora.org> References: <1438710406-3822-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1442411963-14398-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1442411963-14398-6-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <562EC3A5.2070402@codeaurora.org> <562F859E.4010105@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:36735 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759227AbbKSWDg (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:03:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <562F859E.4010105@arm.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Sudeep Holla , Ashwin Chaugule Cc: linux acpi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , lkml , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Al Stone , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mahesh Sivasubramanian Hi Sudeep, On 10/27/2015 8:09 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi Prashanth, > > On 27/10/15 00:21, Prakash, Prashanth wrote: >> Hi Sudeep, >> >> While testing with these patches everything looked fine except that we >> are flattening all the LPI >> states even if it is disabled. I added a simple check to fix it. Please >> let me know if you have any >> feedback on the same. >> > > Looks good to me and thanks for the nice catch. I completely missed to > handle that case. Is it OK if I fold this patch into the next version ? > > I have worked on Ashwin's comments, but was waiting to get some feedback > from Rafael before I post newer version. > Did you had an opportunity to update the LPI patch set? Please let me know if you need any help in test/verification of the new patch set. -- Thanks, Prashanth